NixOS: (1, 2) - You can define specific package versions but with the large repos I doubt there is much QA going on
It depends on the nixpkgs channel you use (I'm also using the term for flakes here, though technically these are then called inputs). The main channels, those being NixOS-stable whatever the current version is at the time and NixOS-unstable have a rather big set of packages that must be built successfully before users get updates, including the tests defined in the build system plus sometimes distribution-specific tests, though these are often rather simple, like start program and see if its port is open. Even more, when a library gets updated, all programs and other libraries depending on it get rebuilt as well, including all tests.
Now what if a package outside of that scope breaks? Most likely, your new configuration won't build, so you're stuck on an older but working configuration, or it does build, but something doesn't work. But I'm the latter case, you can still choose to start the older working configuration.
Also the more complicated packages have very dedicated and capable maintainers from my experience, sure the smaller stuff is often updated mostly automatically with merge request created by bots and just the final merge approved by the maintainer, but the big infrastructure is usually tested quite well.
As a downside, this can sometimes lead to longer periods without updates when a lot of stuff has to get rebuilt and something doesn't work (multiple days, but not weeks). You can then switch to another set in case the problematic packages don't affect you, or just wait. However, saying there's little QA is unfair, in fact from my experience there's more QA in nixpkgs than in most distributions.
I don't recommend NixOS to new users because it abstracts a lot of stuff away and makes use of mechanics that are helpful to understand first. But if you're comfortable with Linux, NixOS is a great distribution that even on unstable works very well. Then again, it allows specific packages to depend on very specific versions of other packages, which is partially the reason you'd use a stable distribution.
Collabora has been quite active in the field, e.g. they're the prime developers of WINE's current Wayland solution. So it makes sense for Valve to partner up with them.
Even with the arrs, jellyfin, et al, it's still not a turn-key solution.
Not quite, all I wanted to express is that spending the time, you can get an experience close to the commercial offerings. And I guess with docker based setups it's rather easy. Never used it though.
Personally I've never been a fan of piracy streaming sites, they always seemed so sketchy.
I'm assuming its API was originally very friendly and unintrusive
Which would make sense - stuff like this automates content creation on your platform, which justifies pricing for advertisement (its main income). Basically bots but not really because they're initiated by a human action.
It's also that they basically raised a generation of users who never had to pirate. Truth is 20 years ago there was literally no alternative to pirating. So you either figured it out or you'd have to drive to the store.
Nowadays, most consumers have gotten complacent, which is understandable given how good the legal alternatives were at one point.
However, while the initial steps might be a bit more difficult nowadays (I strongly advise against torrenting without a paid VPN), getting to a convenient setup is much easier nowadays. The arrs, jellyfin, Kodi, docker, Android devices connected to a big screen etc. enable anyone willing to spend the time to create a setup that can rival commercial offerings.
Just to emphasize, I don't condone piracy here, but the direction the industry is going is unsurprisingly off-putting.
In my humble opinion, it's not even a truck, much less so a pickup truck, but I'm not the most knowledge person wrt manufacturing on the planet, so not sure my opinion counts.
I think it's a pretentious and overpriced car that is inferior to other solutions in every aspect. It's plagued by technical flaws and I find it ugly.
Though I can see that some people like the design. Still wouldn't but it because of the issue at that price even if I liked it
For anyone wondering, this is something Elmo himself said in an interview.
That is, after learning that all his great ideas for Tesla production were not that great after all. But somehow, him not listening to experts and then falling flat for the reasons stated by the experts made him more knowledgeable than them. Also because he obviously spends more time with the issue than people who have this as their job and don't shitpost on some lame site 10 hours a day.
Most of these people take/haven taken part in the IDF
Most likely? I mean Israel has a draft for women and men with the only exception being Orthodox Jews - which, ironically, might be the ones most in favor of the current government. How does that make their point irrelevant?
have been actively participating in Apartheid.
Dude, that word has a different meaning from what you're implying. Call the atrocities in Gaza a genocide, that's fair. But it's not apartheid and neither is Israel an apartheid state, nor an ethnostate. Source: been to Israel, talked to people, there are no Jewish / non-Jewish toilets or fountains or anything, non-Jewish stores next to Jewish ones etc.
The rest of your blathering is just generalization. The same applied to people living in Gaza would make a lot of unjust actions look much better - after all, most of the people in Gaza have kidnapped and slaughtered civilians, no? Yeah, probably not.
Roaming: this data can be moved between machines in a domain if you have a roaming profile. E.g. go to another workstation and your browser configuration is the same? Means it's in Roaming.
Local: this data will not be synchronized between machines when you roam. This could be your browser's cache.
Depends on the perspective, I think people going off the deep end are rather unhappy that their drug of choice is cheap, readily available yet unhealthy, comes with all kinds of nasty side effects and is quite dangerous once you've reached a certain point.
I can say that while my drinking was risky at times, it seems I never enjoyed it as much as some others, reached I liked it but when I quit / faded it out I didn't really miss it. It seems other people have a much harder time not drinking. So I consider myself lucky there.
Not hating on booze or anyone enjoying it. Just offering some perspective on your statement.
It depends on the nixpkgs channel you use (I'm also using the term for flakes here, though technically these are then called inputs). The main channels, those being NixOS-stable whatever the current version is at the time and NixOS-unstable have a rather big set of packages that must be built successfully before users get updates, including the tests defined in the build system plus sometimes distribution-specific tests, though these are often rather simple, like start program and see if its port is open. Even more, when a library gets updated, all programs and other libraries depending on it get rebuilt as well, including all tests.
Now what if a package outside of that scope breaks? Most likely, your new configuration won't build, so you're stuck on an older but working configuration, or it does build, but something doesn't work. But I'm the latter case, you can still choose to start the older working configuration.
Also the more complicated packages have very dedicated and capable maintainers from my experience, sure the smaller stuff is often updated mostly automatically with merge request created by bots and just the final merge approved by the maintainer, but the big infrastructure is usually tested quite well.
As a downside, this can sometimes lead to longer periods without updates when a lot of stuff has to get rebuilt and something doesn't work (multiple days, but not weeks). You can then switch to another set in case the problematic packages don't affect you, or just wait. However, saying there's little QA is unfair, in fact from my experience there's more QA in nixpkgs than in most distributions.
I don't recommend NixOS to new users because it abstracts a lot of stuff away and makes use of mechanics that are helpful to understand first. But if you're comfortable with Linux, NixOS is a great distribution that even on unstable works very well. Then again, it allows specific packages to depend on very specific versions of other packages, which is partially the reason you'd use a stable distribution.