LanternEverywhere @ LanternEverywhere @kbin.social

Posts

0

Comments

470

Joined

2 yr. ago

But that still sounds first person to me. If you're not in the events then "you" are still inside your singular consciousness as you watch events unfolding in from of you. It sounds more like you're an invisible observer, but you're still seeing these events from behind your own eyes (so to speak)

Yeah this is blowing my brain! Literally 100% of my dreams are first person. I don't even understand how you can dream in 3rd person. Like, you're seeing yourself from a distance? But like, then there are two of you - the one you're looking at, and also the floating you that's doing the looking.

WHAT?!

For real, for a claim this big we need a reputable source. I had to downvote this post. If it's true and the news just broke then there'll be a hundred news stories about it in the next 15 minutes and someone can submit a post to one of those stories.

I'd guess that even in the higher orbits the manmade materials will eventually fall down or spin away over the span of a few hundred thousand years. Even if it is currently in a perfect locked orbit, there will be some amount of mass loss over time that will alter the orbit. But I'm no physicist, so i easily could be wrong

This is offtopic here.

Presumably you could use it in a VM running Windows

I would guess that things like massive landfill dumps would be almost impossible to wipe all trace of. There's no natural process that can collect that huge number of different chemical elements in such high amounts into a single location. So even if literally everything manmade has broken down to its consistent elements, the presence of a mile-wide radius plot of earth containing every solid element in the chart would be a clear indicator that an advanced civilization must have been there.

Quote:

They were cut from girders and other bits that were swapped out of the Eiffel Tower during renovations

Agreed, and it matches my experience. I go to libraries pretty frequently and there's always a children's section, and the non-children areas get little to no noise from children.

Where, quote it for me. I looked in 5 separate dictionaries, they all say it's a negative thing.

Huh, definitionally it's always a bad thing, i wonder why people around you use it that way

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/whammy

Sounds like a double win, not a double whammy

I think maybe i get your question. I believe you're asking:

"How does navigation software decide which task you should do at any point? Is the specific maneuver task hardcoded into the map, or does the device itself decide which task it should tell you to do?"

If that's the question then the answer is almost entirely the device (or server the device is connected to) decides on the fly. There are generally no navigation instructions hardcoded into the map data (unless there's a particularly tricky intersection). The navigation software will simply be programmed to use specific task words for each angle of an intersection. Like:

If route angle = -5 to 5 degrees, then say "turn right"

If route angle = 6 to 85 degrees, then say "bear right"

That's similar but different in a lot of meaningful ways. Hydro pumping like that requires a relatively large body of water next to a large geographical height right nearby. This new system doesn't require any water, and it uses a man made hole in the ground that's already been created and which otherwise would be simply unused

That's so cool!

Then i don't understand your question

It doesn't have to analyze the map visually, the graphical map you see on your screen is the part that's generated locally by your device. The map data your device receives is already in vector form, which is a mathematical list of angles, line lengths etc.

Its flavor is pretty indestructible, you can add it any time you like. If you add it early to any dish with solid materials (meat, veggies, etc) then its flavor will get more into the pieces you're cooking. Oh and yeah if you're adding soy sauce then DEFINITELY add less/no salt in addition

Prostate cancer is very common, very survivable, and very easily treatable. It's a serious health problem, but he's almost definitely gonna be fine

Me fail reading comprehension. The article says it's NOT prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is very common, very survivable, and very easily treatable. It's a serious health problem, but he's almost definitely gonna be fine

Me fail reading comprehension. The article says it's NOT prostate cancer