Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)LW
Posts
19
Comments
1,833
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I think the article made a typo that claims GPC is the same as DNT.

    When you enable the feature, the GPC sends a signal... This signal is sent via a special HTTP header called DNT: 1 (Do Not Track)

    But the GPC spec does say it sends a new signal: Another header (like DNT) and a JavaScript variable the client would set. I don't see why this couldn't be used for tracking too.

    A user agent MUST generate a Sec-GPC header

    So if it generates a header, it can still be used for fingerprinting, but this header is actually less restrictive for what the receiver must do.

    DNT was "do not track," and GPC is "do not sell:

    GPC is also not intended to limit a first party’s use of personal information within the first-party context (such as a publisher targeting ads to a user on its website based on that user’s previous activity on that same site).

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • That's an interesting detail!

    I'm not surprised this tagging system is imperfect, but in a broader context -- that a company like Google probably has something a hundred times more powerful and more accurate, and it's scanning through people's whole photo libraries, really adds to their creepy factor.