L3s @ L3s @lemmy.world

Posts

9

Comments

153

Joined

2 yr. ago

Moderating

---

Well thanks for understanding. The question itself was not a problem, hopefully that helps as well.

Because as the mod that removed the post, I'd like to give you my perspective if you'll let me.

• OP made a post that seemed to break rule 5 (we had multiple reports on it), and did not seem like a good-faith question breaking rule 1, so I removed the post
• OP then makes a second post being fairly passive towards me, further showing that they were not posting in good-faith. So once again, removed the post for rule 1 and 5, messaged OP as well explaining this. This could have been a temp ban, I was being nice here, and reaching out to give OP the chance to explain they were not posting in bad faith.
• OP then posts 13 times about the above in other communities, breaking some of the rules in those communities.

As mods it's mayhem if you don't enforce your rules, which is all I was trying to do, we have each rule to keep the community from getting out of control and offtopic. If we had no rules, the community would be filled with a bunch of trolls and offtopic posts.

IMO OP has proved multiple times now that their question was not in good-faith, and they were seeking out arguments (check their other comments) and drama (see the 13 posts).

Icing on the cake: we left their rephrased question up to avoid more of this drama, OP still kept posting the screenshots.

Just want to make sure I understand, you blocked a community because they removed a post that broke their rules?

Thank you for understanding

censored

censored

Those sentences are obviously not being excellent to other commenters here. To avoid a ban (you have broken this rule twice, I'm being lenient) please follow rule 3.

Thanks

Your comment was removed for violating rule 3.

Are you?

Why do most Americans use an iPhone?

≠

Americans, why do most of you use an iPhone?

Risky click of the day.

Whoops! We'll get those back shortly, thank you!

Not this time haha, just people mainly reporting for "breaks community rules" but the comment doesn't

Please stop reporting comments that you don't like, we only remove rule breaking posts/comments.

Lol whoops

@Picasso@thelemmy.club Could you post that in the body for us?

We're getting reports of this not being news/an article

My experience has been very different, I do have to sometimes add to what it summarized though. The Bsky account mentioned is a good example, most of the posts are very well summarized, but every now and then there will be one that isn't as accurate.

Most of what I'm asking it are things I have a general idea of, and AI has the capability of making short explanations of complex things. So typically it's easy to spot a hallucination, but the pieces that I don't already know are easy to Google to verify.

Basically I can get a shorter response to get the same outcome, and validate those small pieces which saves a lot of time (I no longer have to read a 100 page white paper, instead a few paragraphs and then verify small bits)

Yes, I'm saving time. As I mentioned in my other comment:

Yeah, normally my "Make this sound better" or "summarize this for me" is a longer wall of text that I want to simplify, I was trying to keep my examples short.

And

and helps correct my shitty grammar at times.

And

Hallucinations are a thing, so validating what it spits out is definitely needed.

Yeah, normally my "Make this sound better" or "summarize this for me" is a longer wall of text that I want to simplify, I was trying to keep my examples short. Talking to non-technical people about a technical issue is not the easiest for me, AI has helped me dumb it down when sending an email, and helps correct my shitty grammar at times.

As for accuracy, you review what it gives you, you don't just copy and send it without review. Also you will have to tweak some pieces that it gives out where it doesn't make the most sense, such as if it uses wording you wouldn't typically use. It is fairly accurate though in my use-cases.

Hallucinations are a thing, so validating what it spits out is definitely needed.

Another example: if you feel your email is too stern or gives the wrong tone, I've used it for that as well. "Make this sound more relaxed: well maybe if you didn't turn off the fucking server we wouldn't of had this outage!" (Just a silly example)