LLMs are not at this time reliable sources of factual information. The user may be getting something that was skimmed from factual information, but the output can often be incorrect since the machine can't "understand" the information it's outputting.
This could potentially be an excellent way to do real research for people who were not provided research skills by their education. Conspiracy theorists often start off as curious but undisciplined before they fall into the identity aspects of the theories. If a machine using human-like language is able to report factual information quickly, reliably, and without judgement to those who wouldn't be able to find that info on their own, this could actually be a very useful tool.
You're onto a very important aspect of fascist rhetoric. The lies have to be absurd. They have to be obviously wrong. They need the kind of people who are looking to belong to something greater than themselves, not people who look for evidence. Lies like these are a great filter to end up with uncritically loyal followers. Same as any cult.
Sartre wrote about the tendencies of anti-semites in 1944 who followed a similar model of "belief" to contemporary conservatives. Here's a breakdown of that essay.
I think you're making a similar mistake that I have made many times, which is to assume that others are putting more thought into their decisions and beliefs than they actually do.
Among the conservatives, there are a handful of bad actors who are aware of the grift and are deliberately lying to promote themselves and their scam enterprises. The rest of the conservatives are using the cultural practice derived from a religious and/or nationalistic upbringing to uncritically have "faith" in whatever the party line is. Regardless of intelligence, if someone is vulnerable to group dynamics like this (also existing in other cults), it is more important to conform and receive validation from the group than it is to pointlessly research whether or not the group's belief is true and risk ostracisation.
It's not really falling for conspiracies, it's more like conforming to cult beliefs. Conservatives don't really understand the things they say or why they believe what they do.
Why do predators seem to always find the person who will let them sink their teeth in? They're not seeking intelligently. What they're doing is pushing boundaries with everyone. People with healthy boundaries are pushed away, people lacking boundaries let the predators in. The reason the predator got to you was that you either set no boundaries with them or you folded on a boundary you did give showing them how they can further take advantage of you. I was raised in such a way as to tolerate abuse and neglect so my boundaries let the predators right in historically.
"Predator" might seem like a strong word for emotional vampires, closet narcissists, and dependent personalities, but what they are doing is victim seeking. They can't be another way until they identify their own behavior and choose to be another way. Let them push you away when they push your boundaries.
This I think is wishful thinking. If they already made the trade and profited, they're not going to care about the people scooping according to what they did. If the followers-on like me overinflate or kill the asset depending on what the cheater did all it would do is damage the economy. If you are in a position of aristocratic privilege such that insider trading is possible for you, destroying the economy is an opportunity to acquire assets at a bargain.
Having to reliably listen to bigotry and nonsense that you are obligated by social conditioning to nod along with is not only draining but an attack on your own identity by yourself. Either you're torturing yourself by continuing to put yourself in this uncomfortable situation or you will come to tolerate it and not be as bothered by it and corrupt yourself that way. It's worth finding someone with some clippers that doesn't give you an identity crisis on a regular basis.
The difference is that on most days people would need to hide their inside trades. One day a year it would all be out in the open because nothing could happen to anyone. It would wreck the economy and collect wealth in the hands of those who already have it, but if you ride the corruption wave you may not end up among the have-nots.
It the best day of the year to get rich from the imaginary economy of assets. Set a bot to match the trades of some people who will be insider trading and cash in every year.
I am getting very, very sick of the trend of Democrats spending more time trying to appeal to bigoted conservatives than trying to actually represent their own constituents or help the people they ostensibly care about.
Clinton made it ok, Obama made it cool, and since 2016 it's been tradition for the Democrats. Citizens United made our elections into a bidding war and the Democrats are often pretty frank that courting billionaires is about not getting outspent by Republicans. As long as they represent the cause of the problem most leftists are concerned about by accepting bribes, they figure they might as well go for conservatives since they seem easier to convince of things.
The mistake they're making of course is that conservatives don't get convinced by rhetoric or appeals, they get convinced by the strong looking one who promises to defend them from all the scapegoats. They can't out scapegoat the Republicans about the border wall and it's a little insulting that they thought they could, but it's better to them than risking their funding by being ethical in our hopelessly corrupt system.
Has anyone here ever had an experience with authority which helped them, made them feel more confident or secure, or at least wasn't a huge hassle for no reason at all?
Terminally online is an improvement for plutocrats. It used to be that they could never possibly glimpse beyond their limited social circles. Good for regular people to be exposed to just how infantile and narcissistic these "job creators" they used to worship are.
Government is always more efficient and effective than private enterprise pertaining to what government does. Private enterprise is most effective and efficient at yielding profit, since that is the only goal of private enterprise. Government is more effective at establishing and executing regulatory frameworks regardless of profit incentive.
My conservative dad told me about how China was trying to propagandize Americans by opening Confucian education centers in Universities. I explained to him some Confucian concepts and I have to say he got propagandized quick. He especially liked the concept of everyone staying in their place to promote social harmony. I didn't risk talking about filial piety because he's a narcissist who doesn't need that concept. Chinese traditionalism and social conservatism is very appealing to people who like Trump.
I just tested out the classic "She working" vs "She be working," and the machine got it backwards. It can't translate to AAVE, but it probably can appear to be well enough for people who wouldn't know the difference. In terms of available written materials just by population and historical access it seems like there would be way more incorrect white imitations of AAVE to draw from than its correct usage. Like a lot of LLM issues, it's been a problem for a loooong time but is now being put into overdrive by being automated.
In Rat Park the rats who were alone and had a choice between the regular water and the drug water always chose the drug water but the rats living in healthy communities preferred the regular water so they could be sober around their loved ones. Although it's just a joke, the cartoon rat feeling the need to say goodbye to the cocaine button it bonded to hit me pretty good today.
Kwakigra @ Kwakigra @beehaw.org Posts 32Comments 536Joined 2 yr. ago
I have two main thoughts on this