I really think a no state solution is the only one that may end in minimal genocide. As in, neither gets control of their government, utilities, and especially military for a while. Maybe with a dmz in between. More likely, one side will be eliminated, or this charade will stagnate for another decade.
That would be a good point if this was the only reason I felt this way. I personally think she shifted left for political reasons and, as such, will slide back if it benefits her. That said, this is the second time that I'm aware that she's sought to damage internet freedoms to protect someone else. Last time, it was service women on revenge porn sites, now it's "for the children." I don't think she's that great, is all. Of course, someone better would have to run, so I may vote for in the end anyway.
I don't know shit about it, but I'm guessing the ad business isn't really standalone itself. Guessing it's the ad service that kicks in for developers that don't pay for the engine. If that is true, it's stupid to expect both to be individually profitable. It's also likely the ad business wouldn't be profitable if it didn't have all those indie developers that have it incorporated into their games. Really sounds like a working system just wasn't profitable enough, and they needed more blood from the stone.
Come on now, that's not fair, if a wet saltine was my only food, I would choose it over starving. If DeSantis was the only candidate I could put on the ballot, I wouldn't vote.
I wasn't blaming any single entity. And really the first smart phone wouldn't be accurate either, probably the first iPhone. Not so much brand, but popularity. Once the market became so large, and they started to realize they could get people addicted, regular games were over.
Well, at least nothing like that happens anymore....... /s