pewter @ Kolrami @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

329

Joined

2 yr. ago

The day isn't "marked" like in a calendar cell. It's the title of the calendar.

The days are crossed off with a yellow highlighter until November 3rd. From what I know, it's unclear why they stopped marking on that day.

Yes, I agree. I noticed the days and saw no names. He seems to be wrong about what it says, but people in this thread seem to be wrong about it just being some random calendar.

I don't like to replace wrong information with wrong information.

it's just a calendar

I'm very skeptical of this claim right here.

I didn't notice anything specific in the calendar itself, but when I used Google translate, the top of the calendar read:

"For the Battle of Toukan Al-Akher 10/23/7"

I'm assuming the date is October 7, 2023 and it's the result of Google mistranslating from Arabic, but that doesn't sound like a typical calendar.

I feel like people are trying to pretend the hostages were held nowhere.

EDIT: I zoomed in and translated again. I think Toukan was Toufan and this meant "Battle of Al-Aqsa Flood", obviously in reference to the Al Aqsa mosque and using the terminology that Palestinians use to describe October 7th.

In America, that's overwhelming. Compare it to recent president election results.

You cannot change your DNA.

Or can you?

It's basically just a matter of time and legislation.

I thought so too, but it's getting harder to tell the difference between AI and weird people.

The obituary you posted doesn't mention Israel or Gaza. Why did you link it?

The polls said the race was much closer than people online or pundits would have had you believe. I know, because anytime I mentioned it online I'd get downvoted and when I mentioned it in real life people would get angry.

He's been accused of sexually assaulting people, but not Stormy Daniels.

Siena is reputable when it comes to polling. It's not like they just choose a friar to guess what the outcome of an election will be. This kind of surface-level criticism is bad for consuming accurate information.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/siena-college/

q1 and q2 can be negative. The force is the same as if they were positive because -1 x -1 = 1

Good look! My autocomplete changed ex to extra.

From what I remember about this case the mother had terrible gun safety (obviously) and the child was mirroring terrible behaviors he'd seen from the father. The father has been accused of aiming a gun at an extra [ex]girlfriend and attempting to choke out another.

I have a hard time believing some people won't see it as an antagonistic response.

If you're trying to gerrymander in a sinister way you don't want to win counties in a land slide. You want to split up your opponents' counties and concentrate the rest in as few counties as possible so that they lose.

Here's an example with two parties: X and O

Undivided population:
XXXXXXOOOOOO

Situation 1:
XXX XXX OOO OOO

Situation 2:
XXO XXO XXO OOO

Situation 1 is probably the fairest because the population is 50/50 and they have 2 X representatives and 2 O representatives.

Situation 2 is gerrymandered by party X to give them 3 representatives, but it takes fewer Xs to switch and damage the majority. The Os have no real X challengers in the 4th district (OOO).

Are you talking about some other comment he made? When was he trolling and disrespecting beliefs?

The closer analogy would be him turning off Starlink access in areas where people from Gaza would use it to attack Israel.

I always assumed we'd have realistic-looking human machines before we had realistic conversational machines. I don't think that's the case anymore. It makes the movie Her seem that much more believable.