Skip Navigation

Posts
4
Comments
105
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • No,

    Executions should be reserved for the worst of the worst and not the legally ambiguous

  • It should on be reserved for the worst of the worst. Not the people they are not sure of.

    Innocent people are being killed by people who have not conscious of guilt don't care about laws we follow. Kill you just the same.

    Fix that fucking legal system and start a green revolution by deleting the worst criminls we have.

  • Executions should only be reserved for the worst of the worst. The people who don't care they murdered someone. A father that executes his 3 kids and is cool with that is a perfect example for it or a person who is a serial rapist who has now committed murder and NOT the legally ambiguous.

    "We don't quite know if you did that crime so it will be life instead of execution."

    "Oh you just wanted to kill 30 people because you hate your life, don't worry the state will sort you out"

  • Yeah, get a job like us cause, we do fuck all and get paid too.

  • This is a perfect case to point out that criminal can kill you and just get put back in prison. Your family will now forever, never be the same and told to forgive them... what a joke

    This type of criminal should be killed by the state to protect the civil part of society from a person like this.

    Literaly just remove them from life.

    Edit: Chad Doerman, decide for me on this case.

  • Yes. A lot less, possibly the outright ban.

  • He is just saying it. Its not real, he will absolutely change his mind. They always do.

  • Its amazing that he was able to get away with it for so long. Times are changing, accountability is coming. No doubt he will challenge it but, after that... then what?

  • Platelets 💀

  • All day confusion. Lying in bed, rattled, mind racing... "WHAT DID SHE SEE!?" lol good times.

  • Can I buy stickers I can put on a bus?

  • Ha ha ha huge fan of the show. I have taken the bus enough time to be called one, it happens lol