If you're a guest in someone else's house, and they ask you to avoid a topic, you avoid the topic. If they're guests in your house, it's your call. I'd probably still avoid it because I dislike confrontation, unless they brought it up first. Really, though - general rule: Their house, their rules.
Who was that idiot from back in September / October who would post a bunch of articles, then just reply, "I don't have to explain myself to you" any time anyone asked them questions? The guy that got suspended until after the election and just never showed up again?
Sounds like what they're saying is that the normal methods of voicing dissatisfaction are not going to be effective, and we need to shift focus to other, more extreme, extrajudicial solutions, instead?
No Stupid Questions is typically for questions that have answers that are not based on speculation or opinion. That might be better suited for Ask Lemmy. (!asklemmy@lemmy.ml or !asklemmy@lemmy.world)
The issue is that it doesn't matter if it's illegal if nobody prosecutes it, and it doesn't matter if they prosecute it if there's no punishment. Or if they're just allowed to keep doing other shit while the courts are being tied up investigating each individual thing.
Note that only 9 of these have notes about judge rulings.
He can do crimes a lot faster than the courts can rule on his crimes.
I'm not sure what's better: The alligator wearing the hat, the conservation instructor seemingly grabbing its tail to stop it, or the alligator just not giving a shit and carrying on with its day.
Hamas staged a public ceremony in Khan Yunis before releasing the bodies as they displayed images of the hostages and blamed Israel for their deaths, a claim Israeli officials strongly ‘rejected’.
Yeah, they spent more than a year basically leveling Gaza, killed tens of thousands of people, but the suggestion that these 4 might have been among those they killed is just unthinkable.
Also, inappropriately denied medical benefits should be theft with damages of 3x.
If they deny coverage on a necessary procedure and the patient dies because they didn't receive it, it should be involuntary manslaughter at the very least.
If I'm reading this right, their plan is to basically make Republicans vote against popular things, in hopes that it makes voters turn away from them in 2026. That's neat, and in an ideal world where people actually paid attention to what their senators are voting for and the republicans didn't control the media and generate propaganda at an alarming rate, it might even be effective, but I am skeptical that it will have any real effect in the world we actually live in.
Nominations are subject to the filibuster, unless articles like this one stating that a vote was needed to break a filibuster on Kristi Noem's nomination are all incorrect?
If you're a guest in someone else's house, and they ask you to avoid a topic, you avoid the topic. If they're guests in your house, it's your call. I'd probably still avoid it because I dislike confrontation, unless they brought it up first. Really, though - general rule: Their house, their rules.