Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In @ Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

2,891

Joined

2 yr. ago

Totally. I'd also love to train a LLM on my own personal data and preferences, but there is no way I'm trusting a corporation that information.

https://immersed.com/

This AR obsession is utterly baffling to me.

• It's a mobile phone you don't need to hold.
• It's a mobile phone that never goes in your pocket.
• It's a mobile phone that is always on and has access to everything you see and hear.

You have much more confidence in the abilities of an average student than I.

Weird.

I saw "melts tungsten" and my brain decided this was in German.

If they are already familiar with binary, sure.

There are 10 types of people. Those that understand binary and those that don't.

Posting in r/showerthoughts was impossible.

Questions about dark matter removed from r/space

Lots more like that.

Not that difficult. A year ago I was banned from lemmy.world for refusing to get into an argument with a mod.

I've always wonder if it was worth the effort of learning base 12 mental arithmetic.

True, although I would put binary in the "fancy math" category.

Andy why do we even count the fleshy fingers, when we could be counting the gaps between them?

Each finger is conveniently split into 3 parts. Using 8 fingers we can count to 24 without resorting to any fancy math.

Are toes also fingers?

The point is that the DNC shouldn't write her out (or show bias, change rules etc.)

There is no "of" to take 21% from.

Independents are not a homogeneous group. A fairer statement is that 100% of assholes are assholes.

The discussion usually is for the benefit of lurkers and rarely results in changing the opinion of the opponent.

Wrong sub. Post here

https://lemmynsfw.com/c/ifyouhadtopickone

The result of your summary was the erroneous conclusion that the extra cost was for more manpower, demonstrating why the airlines are able to get away with making spurious extra costs.

Because splitting our voter base in parts makes us less likely to win seats in congress. It's called the Spoiler Effect.

Fair primaries have nothing to do with the Spoiler Effect.

If a person's primary candidate loses they're less likely to vote for the primary winner in the general election.

Absolute horseshit. Anyone participating in the Democrat's primary vote will hold their nose and vote Democrat on election day.

I see you using them not arguing against them.

Why would I argue against the article? You're just butthurt that your usual "no evidence" gambit failed.

We absolutely should be promoting safe seats and not primary them.

Why? That is anti democratic.

It also makes sense that the DNC picks who runs on the DNC ticket.

This is about the primary, not the candidacy.

As far as "influence" you keep talking about it but the only evidence you provide is people just don't vote the way you want them to.

These were not my words. I was quoting from the article.