Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In @ Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

2,889

Joined

2 yr. ago

Sparkling water is adults only. No kid wants to drink that.

But in the absence of compelling evidence, it's pointless to wildly speculate about from my perspective

I think that is lazy and naive. For example, is it really pointless to speculate about the official explanation for, say, the deadliest mass shooting by a lone gunman in American history?

I mean, every single flight spraying chemicals is ridiculous.

But a conspiracy that a small number of jet planes have tanks specifically designed for spraying chemicals at high altitude is not unbelievable at all.

I can't imagine a brit using anything other than cheddar.

Hast

These aren't conspiracy theories.

They once were, and then they were proven to be true.

Isn't the conspiracy that some planes are doing it. Not all planes?

wish that was true

It is true

Would you trust Trump to accuratly repeat what he heard?

That’s not the argument that is being made though.

In Meta's court case it is one of the arguments.

So do you target AI training explicitly?

No. Same rules as everyone else.

How can that he even enforced?

Disclosure of training sources

Is my review sentiment evaluation machine illegal now?

If your sources are copyrighted, yes.

What if I RAG copyrighted content in am I in jail now?

Unlikely. None payment of restitution in a civil case could end in jail via contempt of court.

How could this possible be ever enforced?

The same way other copyright claims are enforced.

This issue is dominated by tech illiterate

Literacy in technology has no effect on the law.

fall for copyright propaganda.

We're had many years of publishing strengthening their legal position. It's case law, not propaganda.

Norway may have different evidence requirements.

Actions may have other intentions behind them. Written statement are easier to prove in a court of law.

Hmm. Maybe never was too strong a word.

The previous pope didn't have this problem.

People often think of vaccine development as being all about immunology, but we need to think about the manufacturing side as well. It was very important that we create a safe and effective vaccine. We had to make it in very large quantities for a low price. Not only that, we had to ensure it could be stored in the fridge to be used in a wide range of global health situations

patent waivers were a thing after the Gates Foundation endorsed them.

Too late to damage the share price of their Pharma holdings.

Gates flew to Oxford and forced (as a provder of funding) the University into an exclusive deal with AstraZeneca.

There has been no Oxford vaccine production by any other company.

Late patent wavers are shutting the door after the horse has bolted. The mRNA technology already had its population scale field test.

What about the CIA and the pentagon?

Not 100%. Most children stop being children before they die.

Some of those foods include peanuts which are fine for most people but are deadly for others.

Also, some American companies have created some lab grown food that seems revolutionary, but still lacks long term health testing.