Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In @ Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

2,881

Joined

2 yr. ago

I was thinking this just as I read your comment!

Happytime murders

Melissa McCarthy

I'd stick it in a gallery, must be on the original medium though.

IP is "Infact Pakistanis"

Netflix don't add subtitles just for deaf people.

If it makes them money, they care.

Chess960 is luck, but both sides have the same luck.

For example, they allow you to write

1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 = 1

Which is not possible in decimal

The teachers response is incorrect. It is stated as fact that marty ate more pizza.

Aw. He'll be crying himself to sleep tonight on his HUGE pilla.

Enforcement of ownership must be off chain. You can still have a disputes procedure using blockchain.

What a smart contract registry allows is efficient notarisation of non-disputed ownership, which is 95% of the work.

It's mildly amusing though.

The best kind of correct.

"Monty" was selected (Eric Idle's idea) as a gently mocking tribute to Field Marshal Lord Montgomery, a British general of World War II; requiring a "slippery-sounding" surname, they settled on "Python". Flying Circus stuck when the BBC explained it had printed that name in its schedules and was not prepared to amend it.

We've both said a lot of things that you're going to regret.

do you really not see the connection between discussing cars and public transportation,

That side of the analogy is fine. How is public transport relevant to Bitcoin, Proof of Work and Proof of Stake?

What is the equivalent cryptocurrency concept that public transport is supposed to represent?

they are simply a political cudgel to be wielded when it is convenient and discarded when it doesn’t suit their agenda.

Exactly. Do you recognise that is exactly what you are doing with your "My team did this first" attitude? Be a little more self aware.

Go bother somebody else. I’m tired of seeing you in my inbox

And I thought you were the one stalking me.

What is the matching side of your analogy expansion?

ICE is to PoW

As

EVs is to PoS

As

Public transport is to ???

You said "we need more public transport". How does that statement map to Bitcoin?

Your conservative relatives now give a shit about children's health. Take the win.

Don't try to score on them, putting your ego above a worthy cause.

(Whether or not RFK manages to do something useful is a different topic)

Dude, you brought the slop.

Saying PoS is supporting PoW is like saying EVs support ICEs.

Would you like another go at explaining how your half baked public transport analogy fits into this?