It all depends on context. The Firefox logo is good and fine as a brand logo you can put on the product website, big enough, or the about dialog. But as an application icon I dislike it. I would prefer a simpler, more recognizable, flat-colored version.
I thought I would remember a second one, but I can't recall right now.
Subpaths on GitHub and GitLab would be a similar fashion but would require more specific filters - unless they are projects hosted on dedicated instances.
Project issue tickets may also be very relevant to developer searches!?
I think the main issue as well as my main question is around scope.
You say targets we developers, but the current index is quite narrow. So will you accept significant expansion of that, as long as it may be relevant to Web developers? Where would you draw lines on mixed c content or technologies?
ASP.NET docs is definitely docs for web developers. But maybe not what you had in mind. Would that apply? The docs are h hosted on a platform with a lot of other docs of the dotnet space. Some may be relevant to "Web developers", others not. And the line is subjective and dynamic.
My website has some technological development resources and blog posts. But also very different things. Would that fit into scope or not?
How narrow out broad would you make the index?
I guess it's an index for search, so noise shouldn't be a problem as long as there are gains through/of quality content.
"no warranty" is very different from "expect bugs and breakage"
It tells me they're not confident in or trying for stability. Which means I have to expect issues and fix up time requirements. Which I'm not willing to invest regularly.
From how it looks I assume the "boost" is an AI filter?
Smearing/Smudging was obvious when you looked for it, as well as artifacts on edges on movement.
Do you see more than with your eyes? I doubt it. Otherwise it could've been interesting as a live viewing aid.
Seems like it's application would be very niche and situational. And only if you're willing to accept visual artifacts (rather than having a "truthful"/quality as possible video.
42 million user IDs and phone numbers for a third-party version of Telegram were exposed online without a password. The accounts belong to users in Iran, where the official Telegram app is blocked.
How is that a state exploit of Telegram? It's not even about Telegram. It's a third party app.
The Wadsworth Constant is an axiom which states that the first 30% of any video can be skipped because it contains no worthwhile or interesting information.
These types of infringements could result in a fine of up to €20 million, or 4% of the firm’s worldwide annual revenue from the preceding financial year, whichever amount is higher.
4% can be a lot in absolute numbers for these massive corporations. But it's such a low percentage that it could indeed be included in operational cost and then be ignored.
Kissaki @ Kissaki @feddit.de Posts 5Comments 635Joined 2 yr. ago 
Me in Germany:
uuuh… fuck