You actually posted a screenshot of these comments? The -2 on your original comment counts as "downvoted into oblivion" as per the communities rules?
The community description says nothing about celebratory vs exploring as you claim it to be clearly one over the other here. And your example does not help that distinction either. It makes it more confusing / less indicative of your supposed intention - because rather than facilitating an open discussion and exploration you use a passive aggressive tone, and use this comment chain that was critical and started a discussion. You seem to be doing the opposite - specifically what I talked about - a toxic elevation.
I don't quite get what you made that community for?
Linking to bad content, that was downvoted, and then participating in a celebratory culture of them seems like an inherently toxic and negative thing? I don't see how it'd help the issue.
though it doesn’t help I made something for it.
Are you saying you made it to help the issue, or irrelevant to it not helping?
Not a package but a service or framework dependency:
Our implementation is built on top of a new platform called Rama that we at Red Planet Labs have developed over the past 10 years. This is the first time we’re talking about Rama publicly. Rama unifies computation and storage into a coherent model capable of building end-to-end backends at any scale in 100x less code than otherwise.
This is more of a philosophical question (touching multiple aspects) that doesn't seem fitting to no stupid questions.
You already mention the common aspects to it. We put our conscience, our awareness behind our eyes because of how visually focused we are. We put our body center to our torso and heart, because it's both central to the physical body and the heart and lungs are an noticeable and continuously active part of our physical body.
When you ask you first have to ask yourself, what are you asking for? You used the terms "you" and "self". Where do we draw the borders of those? Do people put themselves differently or is it the same for all of us? Is it objectifiable or subjective?
I'd interpret "you" as the entirety of me. Including body and mind/conscience. Placing myself in it does not make sense, because I am all of it.
"Self" on the other hand be interpreted as consciousness rather than your entirety. But not necessarily so.
That definition doesn't seem to fit the verb conserve or adjective conserving. If it's specifically about government, wouldn't it be better to use a term for that instead of the very broad conservative? Slim Government?
Following that cascade, didn't you just change the probability of door 2? It was 1/3 like the other two. Then you opened door three. Why would door two be 2/3 now? Door 2 changes for no disclosed reason, but door 1 doesn't? Why does door 1 have a fixed probability when door 2 doesn't?
It's not old. It's actively maintained. It has recent releases and is actively being developed. It existed for a long time - as in it's stable and feature-rich.
It's so versatile I use it for all my audio and video mixing, encoding, and conversion needs.
If you can write a small script invoking it for all files automatically is simple enough - and better than manually writing a conversion command for each file.
Replacing costs expertise, time, and money. Nobody wants to invest that for (to them) insignificant or even pointless reasons.
If you're using tooling, a framework, a library - each of those makes a switch more risky, costly, or impossible.
JavaScript works with the DOM. Why would you want to implement a separate WASM component that you have to interface with? JavaScript is good enough. Interfacing only brings problems with it.
When you use JS you are doing it right - because there is no other way to interface with the DOM. Anything else is built on top. How would you interface with WASM? Manually? Library? Framework? What programming do you use to compile to WASM with? How do you analyze and debug WASM when it executes in a compiled WASM-binary format?
The use case for WASM is performance, efficiency on CPU-bound operations. If CPU-bound performance is not a concern for you, or JS is good enough, there's little reason to use WASM. Other reasons are even more niche.
There are much easier things to fingerprint than user mouse and keyboard behavior. Your browser gives a lot of meta and capability information to the website.
To fingerprint, identify, and distinguish users and people through behavior you'd have to take a probabilistic approach and track enough data long enough.
If you're still concerned and want to prevent it, you'd have to prevent the website from receiving mouse and keyboard events. Use an adjusted browser that would disable or use a browser that can do so through an extension with an extension, to prevent javascript addEventHandler and other interactive elements from receiving interactivity events. Note that this may go as far as having to disable hovering highlights if you want to be thorough.
I wouldn't be too concerned about behavior analysis identification - at least not generally.
Kissaki @ Kissaki @feddit.de Posts 5Comments 635Joined 2 yr. ago
You actually posted a screenshot of these comments? The -2 on your original comment counts as "downvoted into oblivion" as per the communities rules?
The community description says nothing about celebratory vs exploring as you claim it to be clearly one over the other here. And your example does not help that distinction either. It makes it more confusing / less indicative of your supposed intention - because rather than facilitating an open discussion and exploration you use a passive aggressive tone, and use this comment chain that was critical and started a discussion. You seem to be doing the opposite - specifically what I talked about - a toxic elevation.