Kissaki @ Kissaki @beehaw.org

Posts

33

Comments

481

Joined

1 yr. ago

Disappear sounds like they vanished into nothing. Does and did that happen? Or did they cease to operate, presumably with some closing handling?

They're also very open and transparent. Work, guidelines, workflows, etc.

It's a shining example of an alternative kind of company, and it's insightful and a great resource of information.

For Windows, what made you decide on Chocolatey rather than winget/Windows Package Manager?

Yeah, no

Schachner says she is certain he was pleasuring himself while they had a conversation she thought was going to be about her career.

In a parade of clips, boldfaced names like Janeane Garofalo, Roseanne Barr, Dave Chappelle and others either defend Louis C.K. or blame the women who came forward or both. Clips of fans walking into one of his shows echo that attitude with a simple, dismissive notion: Everybody makes mistakes.

Meanwhile, the film depicts women who helped expose his misconduct as mostly still struggling, watching as more powerful comics friendly to Louis C.K. minimize their work and what he did to them.

[The documentary] Sorry/Not Sorry asks viewers to consider all this again – as pop culture’s short memory threatens to erode progress made by the #MeToo movement – insisting that the stories of those hurt by misconduct remain a central part of the conversation.

Thank you

The record in this case reflects Mr. Giuliani’s continued failure to meet his reporting obligations and provide the financial transparency required of a debtor in possession.

Most significantly, none of Mr. Giuliani’s business entities have made any production at all despite being required to do so by the Rule 2004 Order.

So they were not transparent and the up to 10 million in assets and debt numbers may very well be made up.

Fifth, Mr. Giuliani has agreed to a one year filing bar following the dismissal of this case, alleviating concerns that Mr. Giuliani would simply file another bankruptcy as soon as this case is dismissed.

Seems like he chose case dismissal over financial transparency.

(It's a long document, with multiple things/decisions, and legal speak, so having only skimmed for that detail, I may not have identified the or all significant parts. Discretion advised.)

It’s crazy that you can read the individual attackers names (in the linked referenced other page), visit their social media profiles, see their happy family pictures, while they're out there shelling other people and families.

And then you see even stuff like

mother, on June 28, 2022, a day after the terrorist attack in Kremenchuk, reposted a post about "The Deadliest Plane - TU-22m3." Missiles from such a plane hit the Amstor shopping mall;

Insane.

The decision […] comes almost seven months after Giuliani sought bankruptcy protection after he was ordered to immediately pay millions in damages to Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss, two Georgia women he falsely accused of helping to steal the 2020 presidential election.

lol, so absurd you could mistake it for satire

too much damages to pay -> bankruptcy -> rejected -> has to pay

In paperwork filed Thursday to seek protection from creditors, Giuliani listed up to $500 million in debts, including the $148 million he owes former Georgia election workers Ruby Freeman and Wandrea ArShaye “Shaye” Moss. He also listed “unknown” amounts of debt to election technology companies Smartmatic and Dominion Voting Systems, which named the former New York mayor in their defamation lawsuits about the 2020 presidential election. He listed his assets between $1 million and $10 million.

So, he has (up to) 10 million in assets. He has to pay 148 million in damages immediately. And has over 352 million in other debts.

How is he not bankrupt? I'd be interested in the ruling. Unfortunately, it's not linked to in the article, referenced, or mentioned why it's missing. Does the ruling publishing need time, or is it press not sourcing?

Holy mother of misinterpretation and misrepresentation. Did you not read their comment, did you not understand their comment, or did you choose to ignore and misrepresent it?

because the pedestrian had been jaywalking

can't have something unexpected non-standard in city traffic after all, that's not allowed!

Over the last 3–4 months, we have observed that CPUs initially working well deteriorate over time, eventually failing. The failure rate we have observed from our own testing is nearly 100%, indicating it's only a matter of time before affected CPUs fail.

damn

when you had to

Everyone HAD to do it. ✂️

Ostrich didn't win the pecking order.

Is this what you call a Roadhog?

Putin, Trump, and Musk. They're doing the same thing. Lying without restraint, freely, at every opportunity.

"The European Commission offered X an illegal secret deal: If we quietly censored speech without telling anyone, they would not fine us.

Maybe we can translate that claim to what may have happened?

"The European Commission asked X to conform to regulation protecting its citizens or face fines."

How about adding a check mark to the money icon? I think that fits better.

Name 💵✅ or Name 💵✔️

As if to say "has money", or "spent money".

dan ce

Hello. This is the EU grammar police. Please fix your typo. Thank you for your cooperation.

Looks like he's getting sucked in and will disappear

I certainly didn't expect an acceptance speech…