KillingTimeItself @ KillingTimeItself @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts

0

Comments

4,358

Joined

2 yr. ago

i've never seen a pro genocide lemmy instance, everytime i've argued against it i've been banned or moderated on, granted my instance isn't pro genocide, so there's that. But that seems to be a regular occurrence on lemmy in my experience.

I posted one thing on the one hexbear thread people used and immediately got banned lmao, what a terrible instance. I just ended up blocking the whole thing because why even bother at that point.

i don't go to bars or anything, so i guess everyone is a man?

spoiler tag didnt appear to work, but this indeed is very stupid and funny.

ban the rowdy ones lmao

unless you have an external opinion, in which case they fucking lynch you.

i mean, i don't see anything necessarily wrong with it though.

It's like making a linux specific lemmy instance, or an anarchist focused lemmy instance (the one im on)

it might go against the principles of lemmy, but there's nothing inherently wrong with it.

with enough admin and moderation you could circle jerk your way into a "woman positive" or "woman friendly space" which would be the idea.

i wonder if it's not just worse on lemmy, but gotten worse over time, with the manosphere shit and all it's relevant problems, neither feminism nor the manosphere, or traditional male gender role has really addressed this issue comprehensively, and we're starting to see pushback from this issue in real life now, men are enrolling into college less than women, they do worse in most environments, and also are generally worse when it comes to mental health.

I wonder if we just need like a dedicated "social issues space" where people can talk about this stuff.

“dragonfucker” and “attack helicopter”

i mean, if they're doing it as a haha funny, i see no harm, but if they're also being assholes, i think that takes precedent. You aren't legally required to fill in your gender tagging appropriately so.

Try making any post that focuses on situations uniquely or disproportionally experienced by women and you get mostly “what about men” or “men have it worst” responses.

that's kind of just how controversial things are on the internet though.

Evens shitposting from men will get similar responses from women, it's just how it is now. Sort of always has been.

the paper doesnt necessarily need to absorb the ink, the ink just needs to dry on the surface is such a way that it adheres well enough it doesn't rub off, or stay wet.

So really, you want a high adhesion, quick drying ink, which would basically let you write on any surface it'll stick to.

yeah no i did a meme, i think the kids refer to these as a "funny"

the joke here being that "liberals did this" just a bit of banter.

but yeah, where the fuck is everybody?

yeah, it's literally just an abstraction of something that you understand enough to be able to cope with that adaptation.

the ability to visualize something is really useful when you don't fully understand it, because it gives you more leverage.

that sounds wacky as fuck.

Guess i'll have to do some looking to see about how we're determining illiteracy these days.

Them calling it “unlimited” when there’s a limit is wrong, but so is using all of the available upload bandwidth 100% of the time on a cheap home VPN service when you consider the current market prices for data transfer. Mine’s limited to 2Mbps. Seems fair for $7/month or whatever it is.

they shouldn't make it unlimited them, skill issue on their part.

If you're selling me 1Gb networking speeds, with no bandwidth limit, it's not my fault for using all of it lol. I'm just using what i pay for.

if somebody does a little torrenting you can just hand wave it, but if someone is doing all of the torrenting, you pretty clearly know about it.

i mean obviously, but unless you aren't teaching kids how to read/write in school, the amount of complete ignorance you would need to expend in your adult life to backslide so far on something so ingrained into your brain structure is genuinely impressive.

sentences in foreign languages are complete gibberish to me, unless i partly know how the grammar structure and language works, but that's also sort of automatic at that point, if i wanted to actually comprehend it, yeah i would have to put work into it, but that's literally me translating the sentence at that point lol.

no, it's just an example of something that would be considered both cruel, and unusual punishment, to provide a sufficient example.

You can't just look at something like nitrogen gassing and go "its cruel because it's killing someone, and also unusual because it isn't utilized often" It has to be literally cruel, as in, you shouldn't do it period (general US laws would forbid it kind of a thing) and unusual in the sense that you would literally never do it.

they just didn't shoot him enough