Remember that no regime, no matter how strong it may appear is ever able to last forever. No democracy, no autocracy, no kingdom has managed to stand the test of time in absolute. Often all it takes is a few dozen people in the correct points to set the dominoes to fall
How bout some LTT screwdriver bit storage (lttstore.com). But you know what can work às amazing bit storage? This Segway, to our sponsor! Vessie. Vessie footwear works as amazing bit storage if you decide to stack their shoes on top of your desk.
EFF
Wikipedia
KDE
Asahi Linux
Thunderbird
Mozilla
Archive.org
Libreoffice
My lemmy host
Voyager
These are all one time donations, i tend to donate around 15€ a month in 5€ chunks. Some have repeated donations, other a single one. Started only a few months ago doing this
Reading books and news on my phone while on the train/ public transit more generally. Great way to actually be somewhat productive. Ironic that I’m on the train rn, but since lemmy is still pretty empty, I’ve ended todays meme session about now
I gotta say, I love the fact I learned this through a comedian, who actually is literate and went through the work of reading and realising the answer is right there
Less well known than other paradoxes] is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.
Karl Popper, 2 sentences after defining the paradox of tolerance he shows an easy answer to it.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
The guy clearly is intelligent, but there’s one sentence that he probably knows is bull crap, which is that Israel did a ceasefire in Lebanon because it wants to focus on a full blown war with Iran. Chances are Israel probably wants to buddy up with Saudi Arabia and others against Iran, and while Gaza was already a sore spot, Lebanon was probably a big no no when it comes to establishing relations.
This has to be bullcrap