No I promise whoever says that definitely fits my description of them. It's not a strawman, it just looks like one because you assume I'm pretending to quote somebody I'm not.
All I'm hearing is that your exceptions to principles are fine and perfect and valid, and mine are not. The only mitigating factor seems to be your belief that we disagree on the subject of xbox advertisments, specifically.
It's really weird to me that your entire position seems rooted on the assumption that Palestine has always been a fully independent and sovereign nation that just shockingly attacked Israel out of nowhere last month.
Actually besieging a civilian population even to the point of depriving them of food, water, and electricity is, but I guess it's justified if you really don't think the civilians being threatened are people.
I'm sorry, the argument you laid out is spurious and nonsensical. I did the best I could to understand it but it really does seem like something that would apply to literally any subject based on some unstated preference. Did you mean to say something other than "campaign rhetoric therefore obvious lie because it's impossible for campaigns to be honest"?
I'm not sure what you think I've attributed to you, I read what you wrote and shared my impression of it. If my impression is incorrect in some painfully obvious (to you) way, maybe you could take the time to explain that instead of simply calling me a liar?