Kazumara @ Kazumara @discuss.tchncs.de

Posts

0

Comments

792

Joined

1 yr. ago

Besides them being stupid as hell to conduct this ridiculous culture war, I take issue with another thing, the name:

Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Education

It's not unlawful until you forbid it. So the title makes no sense. You're not forbidding the unlawful. You're forbidding the previously lawful, making it unlawful.

Stupid assholes.

El Capitan 😁

I have some doubts. Only small or weird outlets have any news on this and there is no good original source linked anywhere.

The Canadian Press explains a potential path by which this claim could have arisen, namely that Slim's company América Móvil had stated in an earnings call that they were going to invest 22 billion pesos (! not USD) in infrastructure over three years and they didn't have plans to invest it in Starlink, instead looking more towards two other satellite companies, and only for rural backbones where laying fiber would be more expensive.

Wow that's quite nice of them as well!

Any news about your part Sir_Kevin? I'm curious if anything has happened since Trump already backpedaled a bit.

Looks like having the option was not that wrong with the partial exemptions that have already come in.

Countries that use Jus Soli usually also have Jus Sanguinis. The USA for example. My friend is a US citizen despite not being born there because his mother is a US citizen.

Not having Jus Sanguinis would be downright horrible. Imagine your mother moves back to her home country and if you want to follow her you have to clear immigration hurdles.

The better term might be "abroad", rather than "overseas". Because Jus Soli is a concept that exists mostly in the Americas. So you'd better not cross over the Atlantic or Pacific sea for this plan.

just like they don’t turn off analog radio

Got bad news for you. They are starting in some places.

The Swiss public broadcaster shut down it's FM channels at the turn of 2024 to 2025, at the end of next year all of the others have to shut down as well. It's moving to DAB+ only, it's a big pain for older cars.

I've heard Norway is even further along that route than Switzerland.

If you divide an inequality by a negative number you have to flip the sign.

If you want to divide out the g before knowing if it's positive or negative you need to make the case distinction.

If you make the case distinction and one branch results in a false statement (5 < 2 in this case), you have disproven the original inequality, or at least discovered a constraint on the original inequality. Then you arrive back at FooBarrington's statement that includes the constraint :-)

I think the thing you'd have to replace is outside the body. Something like this:

https://www.mobihealthnews.com/content/biotronik-launches-portable-cellular-transmitter-implantable-heart-devices

I'm not sure an implanted cellular transmitter would even work, given how human tissue absorbs that spectrum.

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Penetration-depth-of-radiofrequency-into-human-tissues-28_tbl2_323083486

Both of those, and also different signal modulation.

I feel like the title of the article should really be future tense.

I like it, but I'm a little confused.

Why does an individual province determine trade policy? Is this normal for Canada?

This sign implies we want the federal government in our local tax policy?

Where do you read this implication from?

I'm really asking because I might be missing something, because my background is so different.

To me it reads like he thinks local taxes should work differently, either be lower, or be raised based on a different factor other than property value. But I can't see the federal connection.

True, you just need to make sure you start high enough up, or exempt the value of a primary residence (maybe limit the exemption to a non-opulent value of a house so the richest don't start building castles to bind their money tax free)

penultimate daughter

Does that sounds a bit ominous to anyone else? :D

you can run an entire community within a Discord for free

Wonder how long this will last. Bet they are burning angel investors money up to now, going public is the first step towards having to become profitable.

I thought San Francisco were supposed to be good guys? Why are they pulling the EPA in front of the Supreme Court? Just to save some money on their infrastructure at the cost of the public?

The Frankfurter Rundschau additionally writes

Wie Nikita Lofving, eine befreundete Kollegin Brösches der Zeitung sagte, soll das Tattoo-Equipment, das die Berlinerin bei sich trug, den Grenzbeamten als Verdachtsmoment ausgereicht haben, dass Brösche in den USA arbeiten wolle. Lofving sagte, Brösche habe lediglich sie tätowieren wollen – unter Freundinnen und eben nicht kommerziell.

Jessica had tattoo equipment with her to tattoo Nikita, but that equipment made the border police suspicious that she was trying to tattoo American customers illegally on her tourist visa.