Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)KA
Posts
3
Comments
389
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I'll take the compliment, thank you, but really, the expensive ink does most of the work. But i get the feeling that my level of artistic licence might have put the deeper subtlety of the joke out of the reach of most.

  • I undestand AI is very low value on the creative form, and that it might hurt the feeling of the fancier crowd. To appologize for my lack of effort here's the Handmade version, using my finest ink.

  • Watched it, my takes: Trump is definitly the lets make an offer he can't refuse type of negociator. I am thinking that the last week's visits have been hard on their ego. I suspect there is an agreement between european leaders to not let them get away with lies and bullshit when in person, even in the oval office. And it seems to be working, Vance respect comment make them look real fricking weak.

  • Yes, that's what bothers me about the whole thing. All those ''popular science'' exposé telling us that if you just look at it, it will know and change from wave to particle. They put this big eye icon next to the slit and imply you are stupid if you dont just believe it as told. the experiment with polarized filter someone else showed me was interesting, but that's not merely observing.

  • Yes, thats a very easy demonstation of the wave nature of light, what bugs me is the demonstration that it's also a particle that I feel is misleading. Maybe particle is not the right word to describe it's nature.

  • I have been tryin to find an actual demostration of this experiement and it seem impossible to find. can someone sow me this experiment done on a single setup. where you have a light source, two slits a screen and an ''observer''. That swithes from interference pattern to two lines, by switching the observer on and off. I am convinced that the science is solid, in its theoric and applied aspect. but that this interpretation of it is complete bullcrap. And i am annoyed by the ''believe this cheap explanation''that is repeated and nauseam. What is the actual equipment required, wave lenghts, slit sizes. I know This is science meme sub, where is the sub where i can find an actual two slit operator?