Kacarott @ Kacarott @aussie.zone

Posts

1

Comments

206

Joined

12 mo. ago

My point is that even asking permission is very weird in most cases.

Did Codeberg do something/take some stance to attract the attention of the far right? It feels like such an arbitrary target?

What I find mind blowing about the scale of the universe, is that on a logarithmic scale from the smallest possible thing to the largest possible thing, humans live at almost the exact centre.

I think this only makes sense if the engaging couple are like super close with the wedding pair. And even then it depends a lot on the personalities of the couple getting married

He is like tony stark in a timeline where Tony stark decided to join the terrorists instead of building the suit to escape. Oh and in this timeline Tony Starks brain has been rotted away by ketamine

Well first, the US political system is a total mess. In any good system the amount of criticism McConnell gets should impact him, thereby making the ability to criticise valuable.

But yes, I certainly don't think that China is the dystopian nightmare that it is sometimes portrayed as, and it certainly does many things well. However covering up tragedies is still a point worth criticising, and any point worth criticising is worth criticising often (in the hopes that it might change one day).

And this goes for any country, good and bad (by whatever metric one might decide that with). We should praise the good aspects, while criticising the bad. And both aspects should be open to honest discussion.

The reason I think it is somewhat of a big deal is less the fact that it happened, but rather the fact that the Chinese government seems like it tries to hide it, or at least downplays it a lot.

Compare with Germany, where some of the most horrific events in history took place. But Germany acknowledges it and actively teaches people about how bad it was.

The current Chinese government still seems to be trying to cover up for the mistakes of a previous government. (At least, as far as I am aware)

It also means that more people have to be willing to sell (or that if only a few sell, investors hold less power)

Of course everything a company does is in the best interest of the company. Even as simple as "let's make excellent products with lifetime warrantees" benefits them by making people want to shop there.

But that doesn't mean it isn't a good thing when companies realise the customers best interest are also their best interest. We should encourage that, not scoff at it.

Yes thanks for sticking with me

Ah! This entire time I thought it meant separate but equal leagues in sport being unethical.

That makes much more sense now

That separating leagues by gender is ethical

I believe it is self evident, while you are the one claiming that separate but equal is not ethical, which is in contradiction to this.

Because segregation is historically driven by racist motivations such as attempting to prevent different races from interacting.

Why is it ethical to separate sports leagues by gender?

Brainfuck is genuinely a fun toy language, and not that hard to use (for fairly simple stuff anyway). For really anti-human check out malbgolge 🫣

? I was confused by your statement "separate but equal is not ethical" because it's what we already do in sports, so I wanted to ask about it. I already stated that I don't think a separate league for trans people is a good idea, if that's why you are refusing to answer me.

No they aren't, but there is a separate women's league for most sports. So again, I'm wondering if you find that unethical?

separate but equal is not an ethical solution

But isn't this how sport already is? Do you think gender restrictions should be removed from sport altogether?

I don't think a trans-only league makes any sense, but I'm just curious about your stance.

The problem is that both democrat and republican leadership seems completely controlled by the wealthy capitalists.

But what is it in reference to? What's the "infamous if loop"?