I know right? Where does the time go? One moment you're graduating highschool, the next you're signing the divorce papers and wondering what happened for the last ten years
Explicitly anti-discrimination by being pro-discrimination. If they were being honest, they'd anonymized everything, but they don't. They do the opposite and put a spotlight on their race and gender. Their actions speak louder than their words.
I'm honestly confused how you don't. If they wanted to make things unbiased, they'd just anonymise them. But they don't, they put a spotlight on their race and gender. That adds bias, it doesn't get rid of it.
"No government — regardless of which party is in power — should dictate what private universities can teach,” Garber said, “whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.”
Specifically, this tidbit "whom they can admit and hire"
I'm interested in the truth. Just not what you claim to be the truth. And based on what? DEI doesn't have explicit quotas? You can still discriminate without them.
Absolutely it's a mistake, but you don't have any reproductive rights. You can't change it, so all you can do is live with the fact you're bringing a child into the world who will lose his/her parents very early.
I know right? Where does the time go? One moment you're graduating highschool, the next you're signing the divorce papers and wondering what happened for the last ten years