Installing a standard Linux just works
Lol we both had zero and in 6 minutes it went from -3 to -8 and not even a comment to attempt to even discuss this like real fucking people that's scary.
How is this any different then the right people?
Why is this post and comment so downvoted this is honestly a reasonable reason to protest, and you make great points. Abandon Biden is not a bad slogan compared to the shit you see from trumpers. This all stinks
Honestly they fucked themselves they could have pivoted at the top of the hype. even like start selling PC parts or something. obviously the business was failing and they got bought out to prove a point to wall street no other reason. They fucked a great opportunity
Happy gaming :) glad I could help
https://gillian-guide.github.io/ this is a nice little guide for getting a nice basic set up plus it explains how to load mods as well if you have any questions im on their discord or you can dm me here
hmm weird i have it running and GTA IV is honestly better then GTA V with Mods and runs amazingly i would suggest checking it out plus easier to mod
so was messing around and i see that OpenIV doesnt let you install OIVs. Although they are just a zip archive so you can open the archive and place the mods in the rpfs in your mods folder that way. just create a new rpf in your mods folder that follows the folder structure of the oiv installer you can also use codebreaker i find the rpf viewer easier to work in ignore any errors. but still cant get scriptdotnethook scripts to work. the game loads so the scripthook works just wont read the mod assembly. so only scripthookV mods and rpf replacement mods
You might need the lib32 version or have the wrong version of Vulkan it looks similiar to this issue: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=286118
Yeah I run openIV installer with just wine works and then I use this program to create a launch option for openIV in GTA Steam meta data editor I've combined and created multiple img mods openIV has crashed a couple times still works lol I don't start the game from openIV either and haven't had any issues in GTA IV and will be Testing img mods in GTA V tonight
hey so got GTA V downloaded and was able to get dotnet48 installed and scripthookVdotnet does run but i got errors trying the mods stance and disarm. I'm fairly new to this stuff so i don't know what it means but will play around more here is the log to scripthookvdotnet maybe you'll understand more LOG
I am on arch and yeah couldn't get it to install in any proton version except 4.11 but when I would switch back to whatever version I was using for the game it wouldnt work. This way it has been working flawlessly for a few days now
It doesn't normally no that's why it's called a work around I have GTA V I will download it and try it out. Althought theoretically it should work if you do the steps mentioned above. This work around was originally done to get wemod to work on Linux and wine which requires dotnet48
I don't know I'm fairly new to Linux but from my understanding from the comments on reddit and how those commands work. It wouldn't work it's not the dotnet48 installer itself that doesn't work it's some file in the windows folder and proton forcing windows 10. With how windows errors work they don't. it's impossible to actually find the problem. Look in that windows folder it's huge
I forgot to mention when you do this it increases the pfx size from like 300 mb to 1.6gb
I can obviously ponder it. I've shown that. It's just that there's no reason to believe it's any more real than Harry Potter is. It may make you feel nice, but it doesn't do anything. If consciousness can't be defined by whoever is positing the idea then it's not useful to consider.
You thought about it for a second and actually thought yeah living things having a conscience is fiction? What I don't really know how to respond to that If consciousness is just derived from the activity in our brain it's not hard to assume that animals atleast are aware of their conscious being on some small way. That is most definitely more believable then god or Harry Potter.
Just because something can't be defined yet doesn't mean we won't eventually be able to. But you know we gotta get there and again I am not saying these theories are right I commented on a meme.
I love what you said about string theory I would agree but you said it's wrong and maybe this is too and maybe something useful will come out of it but maybe not.
Nothing here has anything to do with consciousness. You can recreate this experiment with no one in the room and it will behave exactly the same, and has a sound (if very confusing conventionally) mathematical cause.
First I was commenting on a meme wasn't expecting these comments lol. but we are active in the experiment that is the point to show that it changes states because we observe Why does that happen and why don't we don't know it's position til observed. It doesn't matter if we are in the room or not we could be 1000 miles away watching on webcam and the same thing happens because we observed it and my side note QM is fucking magic dude
If the conscious observer thing were true, what would it decide is consciousness? Would it require sapience? Sentience? Does it happen for dolphins? Apes? Monkeys? Mice? Tardigrades? What level of synapse connections is it waiting for to decide that's enough? What about humans born without a brain? Can they not see anything? This hypothesis requires so many weird assumptions that it's less than useless. A god existing makes more sense.
Idk why that is so hard for you to even ponder
Science requires testable and verifiable hypothesis. If they can't be falsified they aren't a part of science. They're a belief system. That's fine to have, but don't mix it with science. All you'll do is end up not accepting more data as we learn it because you're filtering it through faith.
So string theory isn't science either show me where string theory has been proven in any sort of way
https://philosophynow.org/issues/121/The_Case_For_Panpsychism
There is a case for even the most fundamental particles having a basic form of consciousness.
And there is studies and theories being created this is just new science and extremely hard for materialists to wrap their heads around I understand that. here are some other sources you can check out for data that I posted on another comment as well
Donald Hoffman Ted talk
Papers from bernardo
And I want to finish off I do not fully believe these theories. They are that just theories just like most things in science start off and still are today.
Sure I agree it could be that as well but there is no actual way to prove that. Since we don't actually understand what it is or how it works we can't remove it, therefore with materialism at this point it's not provable either way. it's also another theory and why I started my original comment with maybe. It's better to explore that data in my opinion then outright deny it without any actual evidence proving it's not. Occams razor is a cop out here
The steam game mode is just big picture mode which can be enabled on steam on any distro