JustARaccoon @ JustARaccoon @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

328

Joined

2 yr. ago

When the vote is either voting for status quo or voting for something worse, that's not a fair vote, it's one made under duress

They'll probably show like the threads in the feed but if you try to open them you'll need a separate app

"dummy" name calling? Hahaha

I know dummy, I meant the ad supplying platforms reviewing them

I didn't say ads can't contain malware, but it's a bit of a "(some) internet malware is ads, but not all ads are malware" scenario, it's very dependent on who they get the ads from and how tight those ads get reviewed. Broad statements like that are just ignorant, and I say that as someone who uses an adblock on all of their devices.

That's just arguing in bad faith, unless you can at least demonstrate that this particular journal has copied their articles in the past.

Even if you were to entertain that thought however it doesn't make them any more guilty of "terrorism" like op called them

Saying that based on..?

Big reach from running ads to it being malware

Hahahahaha no

Calling a news site terrorist for asking for payment for the articles they write in the current political landscape sounds so.. first-world-problems.

There's lots of types, think even stuff like d&d monster blocks, or custom date ones

The "world police" issue is when America gets involved uninvited and clearly with ulterior motives. This is an entirely different situation

I said it renames the part the US controls, this argument of renaming the entire thing is a figment of your imagination, or you're replying to the wrong message. Replace "renamed" with "named" in my sentence and then you have no leg to stand on. Your example is stupid, china is not "a part the US controls", please do not engage in replying to my comments if you're just going to strawman me.

That's literally what I said my dude, you're just arguing semantics over the use of "renaming"

Actually the executive order only renames the parts that the US controls, and they don't control the entire gulf

IP address, same way they decide what language to show the names in

The issue is the US does not own the gulf whereas they own the streets.

Well it's not a private entity hiring them, it's the actual govt. Usually the defense is that those are private companies and they can do what they want but that doesn't apply here

Damn, jumping to accusations sure is crazy, what was your first comment in this reply thread again? Jumping to backdoor accusations.

You download a model that you plug into a front-end that supports that model type, if the front-end doesn't give it access it won't have access.

It's like being afraid of Photoshop brush file, the brush is only used when you want it how you want it within the confines of Photoshop. Same for models. At worst a backdoor would exist in Photoshop (or in our actual case in one of the front ends) that the brush file somehow exploits, but that's a big reach, especially with open source software.

If people are however downloading self contained .exes or something with a model+frontend pre-packaged, well, that's on them. I don't think deepseek makes any such file available anyway so blaming them feels a bit.. xenophobic?