Keep in mind that it might not be related at all to zuck silencing things. Imgur, the main image hosting platform in the past decade or so, purged image uploads from non-users a couple of years ago.
That said this could be doctored in many ways, not sure it's a smoking gun.
I mean does this burn all copies of the "movie" in existence? Does this "remove" this project from ever being circulated and punish those who do it to the full extent of the law? Cause I don't think so, so stop trying to liken my disapproval of word soup generation being called "art" with nazism and fascist ideology.
Also I can literally turn that point back to you, who are you to decide what is art? We're literally Lemmy users arguing shit online, don't try to take the high horse.
Some rich person who doesn't like her family getting their money from oil and is trying to do something good instead is one if the people funding them afaik
I'd argue you can go much cheaper. Also their real competitor in terms of standalone hmds is Meta, not beyond. Beyond is a niche pc only product, not a standalone experience with social potential.
Weren't like a lot of serial killers in the 70s and 80s doing shit like that cause of sexual frustrations? Wouldn't being castrated basically create more of that?
Quest 3 adoption is super high compared to where quest 1 or 2 were at years ago, the apple vision pro wasn't meant to create mass adoption anyway, not at that price point.
Well the good thing about their licensing is that you can buy a version and stick with it in spite of whatever the parent company does, and you're not banned from using older versions like with Adobe's T&Cs
But I don't think companies are transparent enough with how they use things and usually ask for very broad licensing and usage rights for what you upload. Sure us tech literate people should and usually are scrutinizing that stuff, but what about the family aunt who just wants to share photos of their nephew with their close ones? On Facebook for example it even tells you you are only sharing posts with "Friends" or "Everyone" (or custom I guess) which might make those people think "oh just my friends see this, not the platform that I'm using"
Idk this kind of feels like victim blaming. Why should you expect your photos to be used in a way that is so devoid of the original purpose you shared them for? It's like telling people to not go out of the house with money on them, you don't expect to be robbed, so why should you have your entire way of living affected by it instead of punishing robbers when that does happen, or in this case companies that abuse good will.
They're the main server hardware supplier around, especially when it comes to new tech areas like generative technology and things that require a lot of computation.
Keep in mind that it might not be related at all to zuck silencing things. Imgur, the main image hosting platform in the past decade or so, purged image uploads from non-users a couple of years ago.
That said this could be doctored in many ways, not sure it's a smoking gun.