JustARaccoon @ JustARaccoon @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

332

Joined

2 yr. ago

I mean you can still have private property under communism, it's the capital making property that's more owned by the workers themselves, but you can still own things under communism.

Similarly, you can earn capital under communism too, it's just that the tools for earning said capital aren't owned by corporations under corporations under CEOs under the 1%. It's not a cornerstone for sure, but it's not like communism is anti capital and growth and owning things

Or just non fast wireless chargers

Careful with those, almost started a house fire once because the connection wasn't as tight as it needed to be. With it being magnetic and carrying power you run into the risk of metal debris magnetising itself on it and completing a circuit

So he's signaling his potential supporters "it's now or never"... again.

Wut? Aren't apple's cpus based on arm and are able to run modern games like bg3?

• It's about the same size as the before screenshot if you added one more toolbar, except you have better groupings
• you can customize it, if you find features you frequently use are in hard to reach spaces. I doubt it actually fully hides the thing, and they've also majorly improved the search at the same time as they deployed the ribbon so you can use that as backup. It's not like features weren't hidden before anyway, you just didn't use them yourself at the time to notice.
• you mean the extra tabs it can get? It never fully changes everything afaik, just get a few more tabs that are otherwise not needed.

I simply dislike the connection that clean modern design is for noobs and power users just need a list and that's it. It's not like the design is made without consulting or taking in data from advanced users, and if you're truly a power user you can customise it and make it your own. No, I believe that's just stubbornness to trying something new, or lack of openness to do so when it's not a priority to evolve your workflow, you simply want to get from A to B. Feel free to correct me, but tight compact layouts aren't inherently power user friendly, just as padded grouped layouts aren't inherently anti-power user

But the ribbon is the improvement over the non-ribbon UX. There's just no pleasing some people who don't want anything to change, even if they're currently struggling to use all the tools they have available and they've stockholmed themselves into learning workarounds. Someone else posted about how before the ribbon, when asked for features to add, people asked for features that they already had access to, but didn't know about it

It's not that there are no other markets, the key aspect is "exponential growth", they want to (n+5)x their profits year over year

Doesn't office already have a very powerful search bar?

Not sure I follow, even in the example above there's many icons that are interactive but aren't enclosed in a button, do you have any other examples?

Well a big problem is when a UI has a small learning curve that then gives a huge benefit in usability, letting the user decide based on their feelings might lead to them having a worse off experience in the end, is that something you'd be open to getting people complaining about not finding their options day and night while they stubbornly avoid the ribbon?

Surely they will be sued into oblivion if they tried right? Them being non profit was the main pillar holding up their defense for scraping the web into datasets.

"root access is used to bypass security measures!!!! We will make it harder to root your phones to keep your data safe" – Google

The problem is though that the attested platform only accepts Google play as a store, for this to be truly fair you'd need a way to set a default store setting up and then the attestation API checks that store, but as things currently are it's giving Google play store an unfair advantage.

Unless they make a deal behind closed doors

laptop

You're paying a lot of money for the portability.

Or don't max settings

Pfff that makes more sense, I'm sorry @jabjoe@feddit.uk

They are, but we've mostly got our subconscious doing it still, it's not that we're always doing big tasks we just have dedicated processes for it, so maybe that's one way to tackle the problem, specialised processes for sorting data types that engages the main process to do the processing of said data.

I mean if anything, look at Velcro and how generalising a term makes it untrademarkeable. Overusing words can and will screw companies.