JustARaccoon @ JustARaccoon @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

332

Joined

2 yr. ago

It's a good thing we've got people like you making that choice instead of leaving it to everyone to decide

Sadly as many times as needed, complacency is how these companies get "loyal customers" who are willing to put up with bs

Yes, but not in matters of space, but time. It speaks to the current state of Australia's view on monarchy.

Watch Amazon sue them or something lmao

They've only enabled it on a few servers but you can force enable it via vencord plugins

Well who knows, they do offer AI summaries now so they're at least using the data for something,who says they won't use it for other things in the future

"make" usually implies already having one, advising to just go out when given the option to recycle an existing kindle with a debloated experience to instead go and buy something else is encouraging ewaste

Because now you're using discord for more things? You're giving them more data? What's not to like

Oh I agree, it's very much a "forcing a round peg into a square hole" situation, but I doubt discord will make any changes to push back against it

Because a lot of people go to discord servers to access existing information?

I saw this when I was confused how SAMURAI, the fake band from cyberpunk, suddenly got a new album release, and yet it didn't sound anything like the rest of their songs

If I remember correctly they usually have more gamey meat

Ecosia?

Ecosystems and collaboration. If you're already using Adobe for X and Y in your teams, it's cheaper to get a CC license; and as for collaboration Adobe files are proprietary (and tbh so are Affinity files) so it's harder to transition off of them. You can open .psd files in affinity, but wanting to export one will rasterize your text. And you can't even export a .ai file, sure you can do pdfs and that preserves vector information and layers, but that's just friction that businesses wouldn't want to deal with.

They cannot change the terms of a license without reserving themselves the right to do so which would be a red flag, this is in reference to future sales of the license for this software.

Does he have to? Seems like a weird peer pressure thing to invade his privacy.

The heck you mean "close enough", 4% is not within margin of error, and even then this is a grave accusation to lump on an entire demographic.

"Primary" does not mean "always" however

Even if the UK is not in the EU the GDPR still applies there, just the version it got while it was in the EU tho, no revisions

What stats are you working off of for those 3 decade estimates? Either way the point remains, the sentiment of "we should've done X decades ago" doesn't mean we should now be able to do it instantly, it just means we had the information and knowhow to start working towards it decades ago and we didn't do it.