Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)JU
Posts
11
Comments
1,482
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • There are a whole bunch. The two that spring to mind:

    • The Dawn of Everything (David Graeber)
    • Sapiens (Yuval Noah Harari)

    Both have blown many minds. Other ideas:

    • A Short History of Nearly Everything (Bill Bryson) - about science, extremely readable
    • The Ancestor's Tale (Dawkins) - evolution, the book the author is most proud of
    • Collapse (Jared Diamond) - brace yourself because it's convincing
  • True in spirit but not to the letter. You can fire up your own server and federate Bluesky. The issue is that Bluesky's centralized design means that you would be hosting a clone of literally all the data, which requires serious infrastructure and expense. But the protocol is open, so in theory an alternative provider (with resources) could do it.

    If all Xitter users decamped to Bluesky, that might create incentives for more providers to step in, creating some competition and accountability. Non-profit foundations with deep pockets could do it, for example. That would definitely be an improvement compared to today's corporate social media.

    But I agree that ActivityPub is the more democratic solution.

  • Important clarification: it's much more than this. HarmonyOS is not any more a skin or a version of Android. It's its own OS.

    HarmonyOS is IMO going to do to Android what BYD has done to Tesla and VW. This is another chapter in China declaring independence from the West.

  • Calm down. The USA is not by any measure an "authoritarian dictatorship" with "no rule of law". Not yet. Instead of wailing histrionics like this, Americans would do better to roll up their sleeves and do something to stop the slide.

    Make sure your representatives know what you think. Get involved in local politics. Protest. Its precisely because your country is not an authoritarian dictatorship that you (still) have so many options.

  • This is the closest to a sensible response so far. The problem then is that it is basically impossible to spend lots of money without creating pollution somewhere up or down the chain. Because money is itself a vector of pollution. But your point is taken.

  • The 3% figure is going up, up, up exponentially with no end in sight. Because right now, most of the world's people have never set foot in a plane but they sure want to. And why shouldn't they? After all, we do (or do we?).

    That figure is in fact misleading for the purposes of this debate, because for individuals flying has a huge impact on one's carbon footprint. That's not surprising when you think about it: it's similar to driving (alone in a smallish car) for the same distance, but who drives to NZ and back? The problem is distance and time. And most people in the world have never taken a plane. It's a completely unscalable as an activity.

    About alternatives, the premise of this whole debate seems to be that the only good holidays are ones far, far away. That is very debatable.

  • I'm less bothered about being a killjoy than I would be about being a hypocrite.

    On an individual level, vacations are not an "incredibly small factor". For an average person, a single flight will wipe out all their other conscientious efforts in terms of diet, housing etc. For some reason most people are only dimly aware of this fact.

  • This has the feel of a marketing questionnaire. "Are you not ready to give a 5-star rating to Linux? Click here and we'll get right back to you!"

    Oddly enough, I'm struggling to think of a single experience or feature. The decisive benefit of Linux specifically and FOSS in general is something less tangible: it's the feeling of empowerment and control you get. A computer of any kind is always something of a black box. Knowing that you have full control over it, even if you don't understand everything, is revolutionary. I'm certainly not going back.

  • If people really aren't interested in the impacts of their choices, why should I not be disappointed? Why aren't you? Surely it's disappointing. Nobody will be taking any luxurious distant holidays on a planet that's been made unliveable by the cumulative impact of 8 billion people who don't give a shit.

  • I will answer for them. Because flying from the Netherlands to New Zealand in economy class will emit the equivalent of about 4 tons of carbon dioxide. Roughly equivalent to driving a car every day for a year or so.