JohnEdwa @ JohnEdwa @sopuli.xyz

Posts

1

Comments

761

Joined

2 yr. ago

Apple spending 3 years researching and determining it is not doable due to technical limitations:

That “10W for the screen” includes them all.

No.

Taken straight from the LCD deck in front of me: With the screen as dim as possible sitting in the home menu, the total power usage of the deck is 4.9 Watts. The GPU is drawing 0.3 Watts. The CPU is drawing 0.3 Watts.
With the screen brightness turned to full but the deck idle, the power draw goes to 7.1 Watts, but the screen stops updating the image after 10 seconds. CPU & GPU are both still at 0.3 watts.
Jiggling the stick every few seconds to keep the screen on, the power draw goes to 9.6 Watts. CPU & GPU are still 0.3W each.

Result: The "rest" of the Steam Deck, minus SSD and cooling fan activity at full screen brightness, uses 9 Watts, at least 4.7 Watts of it being the screen and backlight alone, though I was not able to test how much the draw would be if the screen could be turned completely off, as that isn't possible in SteamOS.

15W + 9W is 24W, we are a watt shy of 25W.

That "10W for the screen" includes them all.
When you reach the 15W TDP limit with the screen at max brightness (on the LCD version), the OSD will show you drawing about 25 watts, and it's measuring it directly from the battery. This also matches what people have reported for the power pass-through mode measuring from the wall outlet - once the battery is fully charged the Deck can power itself directly from the charger, and at full tilt, it's about 25 watts.
Sure if you really want to start separating them all out there are things like bluetooth, wifi, speaker amplifiers, the SSD etc, but compared to how much the backlight & screen controller draw, they are pretty much drops in the bucket. Well, the SSD might take a watt or two.

They went to gitlab, it was inevitable. And probably planned - what better advertisement for your name than a round of news and articles about the takedown. And now they are on a private git so for the next round, Nintendo has to actually sue them as well.

It's old by now, but Telltale's Walking Dead. Loved those games, and loved those characters.

There is no limit to when it will charge, you can use a lower power charger to extend your runtime - I use my 9V 2A (18W) Pixel 4a charger all the time while playing. Anything higher than 25w will keep you playing indefinitely, as that's pretty much the limit for what the deck can draw - 15W TDP and 10W for the screen, but obviously if you draw more than your charger can output eventually you will run out of battery.

But for quite a few lighter titles, 18W still gives you a few watts of net positive.

It's only a matter of time until they completely ban porn.

they pitch a “deck that could actually play Fortnite” - game from a company who’s CEO actively hates linux for whatever reason (maybe it kicked his dog, I dunno)

Nah you see, they just don't have enough programmers. Poor, poor small, 4000+ employee Epic :(((

"Why is Fortnite still not playable on Steam Deck?
If we only had a few more programmers. It’s the Linux problem. I love the Steam Deck hardware. Valve has done an amazing job there; I wish they would get to tens of millions of users, at which point it would actually make sense to support it."
-Tim Sweeney, CEO of Epic.

Don't worry, in the event of a malfunction you can just detach the cargo, so now you have two apartment building sized things falling from the sky to completely unpredictable random locations squishing anything they land on top of.

LLMs are the current big buzzword and the main ones that "don't work", because people assume and expect them to be intelligent and actually know and understand things, which they simply do not. Their purpose is to generate text in a way that a human would and for that they actually work perfectly - get a competent LLM and a human and ask them to write about something, and you are very unlikely to spot which one is the machine unless you can catch them lying, and even then it might just be a clueless human talking about things he kinda understands but isn't an expert of. Like me.
But they are constantly being used for all kinds of purposes that they really don't yet fit well, because you can't actually trust anything they say.

Image generation mainly has issues with hands and fingers so they aren't bullet proof at making fake realistic imagery, but for many subjects and style they can create images that are pretty much impossible to identify as being generated. Civit.ai is full of examples. Most people think it doesn't work yet because they mostly see someone throwing simple prompts into midjourney and taking the first thing it generates for an article thumbnail.

And image identification definitely works, but it's... Quirky. I said it can't be used to identify mushrooms, because nothing can identify two things that look exactly the same from one another. But give one enough photos of every single hot wheels car that exists, and you can get one that will perfectly recognize which one you have. But it will also tell you that a shoe or a tree is one of them, because it only knows about hot wheels cars.
Making one that is trying to identify absolutely everything from a photo, like Google Lens, will still misidentify some things as the dataset is so enormous, but so would a human. Just that for an AI, "I don't know" is never an option, it always says the most likely answer it thinks is right.

You are lumping a whole lot of different things that work in completely different ways under the singular label of AI, and while I can't really blame you as that is what the industry does as well, image recognition, image generation and large language models like chat-gpt all work entirely differently.
Image recognition especially can be trained to be extremely accurate with a properly restricted scope and a good dataset, but even so it would never be enough for identifying mushrooms because no matter if it's being done by the perfect AI or an organic meatbag, mushrooms simply cannot be accurately identified from a single picture as they can look literally identical to one another in many ways.

And parrots totally can learn what words mean. Just like how a dog can learn what "Sit", "Paw" or "Let's go for a walk" mean, parrots just also have the ability to "talk".

And anything you write or upload to Lemmy should be considered permanent, as it immediately spreads throughout all the instances and they actually don't have to respect edits or removals. And if instances defederate from each other then they simply can't, as they don't sync those requests any more - if Lemmy.World decided to defederate from Sopuli, this message would become permanent and I could not do anything about it.

Also, this who saga about the uploaded ID picture.

I get you.
Here's hoping this new thing allows them to make it work better eventually, as the current system is a result of the older family share system - before the owner banning was implemented plenty of games just disabled family sharing entirely as a workaround for ban evasion.

Right now I believe the only workaround would be to use the parental controls to not share those games you care about enough.

"I'm new to this Teams thing, but I'm now WFH so, yes."

And even back when Microsoft bought the mobile phone operations the company making the phones was Microsoft Mobile and Microsoft only leased the brand name from Nokia to use on their mobile phones for 10 years - same as with HMD Global today.

Patents last for 20 years, that's a long time for something unique and groundbreaking to become mundane and seemingly obvious in hindsight, especially when almost everything these days builds on top of something already existing at a break neck pace.

But the problem with the current system is that everybody has to try to patent absolutely everything they come up with because if they don't somebody else might and then sue you for it, and instead of the patent offices actually doing their jobs and dismissing them outright so they would be free to use for everyone, they grant patents on the most simplest or broadest of things.

The silver lining is that plenty of great new things have been made specifically because people have been trying to avoid someone else's patents - "necessity is the mother of all inventions", literally.

CyanogenMod

Now that's a name I haven't heard for a long time. But I still do remember how the entire community continued under the Lineage name as if nothing had happened. As is to be expected when open source project tries to commercialize. Does anyone actually know of a project that has done something similar and not immediately failed?

Also when you combine this with some other news, like "Bots now make up nearly half of all internet traffic, and that's very bad news for our security", it skews it even further to being rather meaningless - bots are probably doing quite a bit less bittorrenting.

There was a blip in time a few years back when you really didn't need to learn how to bittorrent, you could just google what you wanted and you'd get a pirate streaming site showing it. I've been torrenting for almost two decades now and still kissanime/aniwatch/zoto whatever was the faster choice most of the time, and even now I sometimes use the Kodi plugin Otaku when I just want to watch an ep or two while eating, and that grabs stuff from streaming sites. Granted it is getting worse and worse, with the sites being absolutely riddled with ads and seemingly rebranding twice a month due to takedowns which has me going back to nyaa more often.

Ah, downloading postage stamp sized anime releases that still took all day. Forget binging a series in one go, you watched an episode or two a day because that was as fast as you could get them.

But you can't forget the absolute minefield of the era of Kazaa, Emule & Limewire - you never knew when you'd get a virus, something random, literally just cp or actually manage to grab the thing you intended to.