Ukraine's infrastructure strikes have been some of their most cost educative, whereas it's baffling why Russia is investing so many missiles into infrastructure attacks with so little result. Russia would need to offer concessions to induce a mutual infrastructure attack pause, not the other way around. Makes me think it's a ploy to look like they're offering something without actually offering anything.
That puts it at a 12C charge rate. The question is how the batteries will hold up over time. Does each fast charge cycle make a noticable degradation to the capacity?
If they're using LFP it's probably okay, they can usually take higher charge and discharge rates at the cost of lower energy density. But I'd be worried if they're pushing NMC battery chemistries to 12C, as I think that'd kill the life of the battery.
Yeah I'm familiar with Ariane 6. It costs almost double what SpaceX changes external customers per launch, not even counting that their internal rate would be even lower. Plus you'd need more launches since the payload capacity is lower. You'd end up paying 3x or more the cost. At that point, why not just buy falcon 9 launches? Otherwise it seems like there'd be very little way to compete.
Thanks! Sounds like limiting risk from the California bill is a plausible reason, but it isn't confirmed.
Legal Definitions of "Selling Data" Under the CCPA Are Broad: As noted above, the CCPA's definition encompasses many data-sharing practices that may not align with common understanding of "selling data".[16] Even if Mozilla was not directly selling user data, its search partnerships, telemetry data sharing, & sponsored content could have been interpreted as data sales if Mozilla received any financial benefit from them, all of which were actions that Mozilla has already been transparent & upfront about.
Mozilla's Search Engine Deals Could Be Considered Data Sales: As mentioned earlier, these partnerships could legally qualify as data sales under the CCPA definition, despite being an existing part of Mozilla's business model that consumers are already aware of.[1]
Sponsored Content in Firefox's New Tab Page Involves Data Exchange: Mozilla dReferencesisplays sponsored content and ads on the Firefox New Tab page, which may involve user interaction data being shared with advertisers.[11] Even if the data is anonymized, the CCPA considers certain types of aggregated data as personal information if it can be linked back to users.[16]
The story I heard was that by of California's definition of selling data, doing anything with user data that could benefit the company was considered selling data. So they updated their FAQ to be in line with that definition. But I could be wrong, if someone could point me to a good article I'd appreciate it.
The temporary restraining order was filed weeks ago, and they should go into effect immediately. So it's actually absurd that they were able to delay it this long.
Agreed, we need to get rid of Putin, the root cause.