Jimmycrackcrack @ Jimmycrackcrack @lemmy.ml

Posts

34

Comments

859

Joined

2 yr. ago

What turned out to be the problem application?

I was unbothered by it as well, at least intestinally, the physical pain of something hot enough was certainly something I could experience and dislike at the extreme end but my stomach and bowels would have been fine. That it until about the past 5 years or so when my stomach suddenly decided it couldn't handle all kind of things that were never a problem before and now I totally get what people were talking about. It's pretty sad, I miss being able to reliably tolerate highly spicy food.

The easy answer is no, that is not an overreaction to the problem as you've assessed it. You didn't want to drive to begin with, because of doubts about your capacity to drive, then when you did drive you encountered a dangerous situation and now you don't to do it again, that's just rational.

The tricky part is deciding if you're going to persevere anyway. Though not wanting to drive again is rational and probably good for everyone else on the roads, you are also most likely not uniquely incompetent even if you're self critical and doubting. This might be where the idea that you are overreacting comes from, the tension behind this rational response and the simultaneous idea that perhaps you're being too self critical. Ironically, I think both are true.

For better or for worse we're living in a world where you can continue to do this and on balance of probabilities, you will get used to driving and get more capable with it, but there'll be a period while you reach that stage where you and everyone else on the road will be at risk of harm. That's not a great situation and something that in other contexts for other activities might not be tolerated, but it also might be a necessary one. It might perhaps put your mind at ease (or the opposite depending on how you interpret this), to realise that the road is full of drivers that might not be "good" drivers because they're, nervous, have bad multitasking, are drunk or on drugs, are tired, aren't concentrating, are underconfident, are overconfident, angry right this second, inexperienced, over experienced to the point of becoming inattentive and all manner of factors that should objectively mean people just shouldn't drive but nevertheless we do and in the time and circumstances that we find ourselves in you wouldn't be against the moral zeitgeist on this to decide that driving is necessary or beneficial enough for you that you're going to become just one more such driver less than optimal driver in the roads. Hopefully after a while you'll get past the fear and inexperience and that will make you a driver of at least average competence.

This isn't to say I think you should do that. One less car on the road, especially driven by someone who by their own judgement thinks they aren't a good driver and also doesn't want to drive would, in the grand scheme of things be good, but I acknowledge it would be hypocrisy of me to suggest that you should exclude yourself on this basis when very few of the rest of us would.

Their question seems to be about buying from outside the US rather than from. They're asking about risks involved with importing stuff there.

They're pretty good, they definitely improve an otherwise pretty average burger. I've rarely had them on actual good burgers but on those occasions they were also good, but I think the trouble is that in that context it's kind of a distraction and just a bit too much added water weight if it's an otherwise nice hefty and generous burger. They definitely need to be cooked themselves a bit to caramelise them though otherwise not really worth bothering with.

That seems like it still counts as a love story then, or at least "romance" given that that's primarily what it's plot and themes revolve around. What qualifies something to be a love story if not that?

Me too. 😀 I think you can safely guess most people who clicked on this post would like to see the recipe.

That's all well and fine but do you really choose to abbreviate shampoo as "poo"?

I wonder sometimes what it's like exactly, being in the Cheeto guy's head because the idea that he and Elon would have a falling out eventually just seemed so utterly predictable to me, some guy, that it's sort of hard wrap my head around how he could fail to see this coming. People will say o shouldn't be surprised, it's not complicated, he's just dumb but like, this isn't like a policy thing, it's not that I'm surprised he didn't expect his ideas to fail it's just this personal relationship was so clearly not to last because of what both these guys are like and I'd have thought this should be obvious to Trump himself from prior experiences with people. It was never going to work where the new friend and political ally views himself as at least an equal, Trump's obviously going to hate that.

What's this in reference to? I'm out of the loop.

Does that make Windows Millenium Edition, equivalent to Windows 1000? If so we've have some pretty weird-ass technological developments. 3.1, 95, 98, 2000, 1000, 7, 8, 10, 11. If you were just tracking history through windows versions you'd think we'd gone through some sort rapid technological expansion followed by a civilization destroying catastrophe, followed by a very long road to recovery that we're still in the midst of.

In such a case, does the plaintiff have to actually have a kid though? Like if it's an open secret that the case is manufactured, do you not get in to any kind of trouble if for example you made up the hypothetical damaged child? Because otherwise some poor kid is still going to have a rough time whether the case is "real" in the sense of a genuinely outraged parent who suddenly decided to sue, or "manufacturerd" in the sense that the story is basically hypothetical and can't be disproven and the motivations for suing are part of a political movement with backing and strategy behind it.

Black sight? Binocular Superiority? Better Seeing?

I can't believe I've never seen this before! This was fantastic!

I noticed the gradual shift from program to app over time since the iPhone took the world by storm, but then again it was never incorrect. Applications are synonymous with programs so an executable on your windows desktop is an app as much as it is a program.

I've never come across anyone referring to a Reddit account as an app but I can definitely see someone who interacts with Reddit exclusively using the Reddit app referring to both the platform and a means of accessing as the same thing both out of a conscious choice for convenience or ignorance and actually they'd be right either way except in the latter case only accidentally since it you say "I really love using that app Reddit to look at memes and talk to people" despite not actually knowing the app isn't the platform, your sentence would still be correct.

The activating thing, I jimmycrackcrack declare that I will allow it. Look it's a sneaky hardware manufacturer and provider term to imply the device doesn't work until you give them money but then, as a piece of language with utility, well... your phone doesn't work without a sim, at least in the common understanding of what "work" means here. Since a phone of any stripe, dumb or smart is pretty useless without a sim card, getting that message across to consumers that you have to do something to make it functional, to "activate" it is necessary. You could choose to frame it as unlocking but then again if you're selling these things you probably don't want people thinking you locked them up and then sold them the keys and in fact, the manufacturers kinda didn't, it's the service provider that doesn't provide service to a functioning device until they're given money, who are doing that and given they're a business, that's sorta how they have to operate.

This'd be great since it's a whole lot less morally compromising when it wasn't even us bumping them off.

Would they have any money to buy anything?

I'm sure it was great but I gotta say this arrangement of foods and the lighting and the white balance have come together to make the weirdest image. It's somehow really unreal. It's like an artist's impression of food. I think it's mainly the colour and lighting, the avocado is somehow so green it looks almost fake, and the bacon is somehow purple and then the unexpected left turn with the boiled eggs when my brain saw "bacon and eggs" in the title and built an expectation for the typical fried eggs.

Anyway, this is no critique of the food, hope it was good, it sounds good. The image is just somehow hilariously incongruous and strange.

Yeh man, SatansMaggotyCumFart is right, some word choices are just inappropriate.

Do I misunderstand emby or does it just not seem like a good deal on the basis of it being an ongoing subscription? I use the free version of emby and it's really great. There was at least one feature that required payment to unlock. I like emby already and when I tried using jellyfin, the core features that were on both it and the free version of emby worked far less reliably and the paid feature on emby that was free on Jellyfin, worked extremely unreliably. Obviously resources and development had been spent to make something that worked very well and their paid feature probably would too. I use emby to make it easier to cast media locally to my chromecast and to access media on my computer, from my phone in my bedroom, so for me, it's a fancy file browser and media player. The feature I wanted was to do with free to air tv streaming and I was thinking I'd be happy to pay for the Emby software to unlock this since they made good software that works. But here's the thing, it's FREE to air TV and yet they want me to pay, ongoing, in a perpetual arrangement to use it. I don't get it. I use it to play media, but the media is my media stored on my machines. I understand software development isn't free, I was happy to pay ONCE, but why would I keep paying when they don't actually produce the media I use it to play? That seemed unjustifiable.