What's the funniest belief you had when you were a child ?
Jimmycrackcrack @ Jimmycrackcrack @lemmy.ml Posts 34Comments 863Joined 2 yr. ago
Hey thanks. Turns out I'm actually banned from at least one community. They think I'm a bot. Beep boop.
EDIT: Actually, I think that must have been lifted. I commented there earlier today and the post has upvotes so I assume people can see it. Is there any way to be notified when both banning and subsequent unbanning happens? The Modlog doesn't mention the unbanning part of the equation.
I thought they'd already bought it, I didn't know it was still in question. What a bummer. This was going to be hilarious.
is that what this guy did? I didn't know logs were public. Is there an efficient way to search them?
Did it make you buy her a gold necklace?
I am presumably a lot less qualified to speak on matters of economics than an economics teacher (assuming they became one through a background or qualification in economics), I'm also not even from the US. That disclosure aside, given you put this question to the masses and to the world here's my take.
I can't figure out how your teacher could have come to this conclusion with intellectual honesty. If my amateur's understanding is correct, this forgiveness program is achieved by the US government paying for the loans, so it's difficult to say on a basic level how any theft can have occurred. This is especially plain given the program is limited specifically to loans issued by US government in the first place as Federal student loans. If I loan you money and then tell you not to worry about paying it back after all because I've decided to forgive the loan I can't find a way to frame that as theft. Who's been stolen from?
If I really stretch I could see people who paid their own loans in full before this happened feeling like it was pretty unfair, but they weren't stolen from, just unlucky in timing. Some people will say of taxes generally, that they feel like the money taken from them by the government in taxes is theft, but in that case this specific instance of government expenditure is no more theft then the latest batch of F35 fighter jets bought by the military or the wages paid to the local garbage collector to take out your garbage or any government spending at all, since that money all comes from taxes. Maybe your teacher is trying to tie the potential economic costs of the policy in to a narrative of stealing from US taxpayers. Maybe the costs of the program could theoretically mean taxes have to be raised at some point, but again though, you already have to pay taxes and how much, more taxes or less, is up to the administration in charge at any given time based on what they think is necessary. This is how the US or any country has a government at all which is generally considered necessary by most. When the government operates and uses taxes to do so, the citizens essentially pay for a service, that service involves the government making decisions on your behalf on what to do with the taxes you paid them. If most of the taxpayers don't like the decisions and think they were bad choices they change their government and lobby representatives, it doesn't make the decisions themselves theft if you just don't like them.
That's about all I can think of in the absence of your teacher's justification, for how the loan forgiveness can be called theft, trying to be as fair as possible to those potential reasons, I still can't find a way to make the statement true.
I'm sure those who know more about this stuff will roll their eyes at this question but like, I'm about 9 minutes in and why do almost all the examples the guy's using have white pixels flashing on and off around the edges of the screen? Around 8m25s in particular it's evident. I thought maybe it was a snow or rain effect, but I don't think so. It looks like an artifact of some kind.
What happened there? I followed the link but it looks mods removed whatever the offending poster had done.
I particularly hate those airblade things even more than regular air dryers. I like that they're faster and typically not as gross and warm but they are designed in a way where you feed your hand in to a narrow gap with powerful air jets in front of and behind your hands in this gap. Your hands are not a completely uniform symmetrical shape, so the jets buffet your hand around and they inevitably touch the parts of the device where the jets are located, right where everyone else has had the same thing happen. It grosses me out.
Australia and NZ, different kind of Cornwell, with an 'e' unlike the country in the UK with an 'a'. Not sure what Cornwell the sauce manufacturer is referring to, I guess someone's name a long time ago?
Plum sauce in general is pretty nice but oddly enough, other than this one obscure discontinued brand it actually isn't usually that good on Mac and cheese. I was disappointed to discover this. Growing up I'd only ever had that on Mac and cheese and I assumed that that was what plum sauce generally tasted like. As it turns out I was wrong because there's lots of styles, but the one thing they have in common is not being like the one I miss. They're probably good with various Asian foods but only that Cornwell's stuff worked with the Mac. :(
I think from memory stuff was generally very formulaic but there were awesome exceptions to that rule in terms of commercials that you don't see so much now. Looks like it would have been a fun time to work in advertising.
Cornwell's Plum Sauce. I haven't seen it since probably 2001 and I still want it back. It was the best thing on Macaroni cheese. The closest alternative is Masterfoods BBQ sauce and it's great but it's never hit the same. I tried other plum sauces since there are hundreds but it seems Cornwell's take on it was really different to everyone else's in a way I can't describe so I don't know what to look for in an alternative. Even if I did find another plum sauce as good, the bottle design and logo are iconic for me and part of my childhood.
You sure do.
On balance it could be that the risks to your personal safety might outweigh the perceived increase in secrecy. To me I don't like the idea that I've left a record that can be questioned if I'm getting prosecuted, but you're right I haven't factored in the overall risks from the alternative.
Yes, indeed. Hence the earlier, "HOW GET MONEY?" someone so eloquently asked in relation to this dead drop method. You could arrange your own dead drop for the dealer's payment I guess, or stuff the money in to the same tree. It's all a bit fraught, and requires you both to trust each other even more than a deal normally would. The system seems to be pretty flawed. Guess it works of you're happy to leave an indelible record of you transacting with this person and if you trust them to actually put the goods there rather than just take the money since you'll never see them and have no recourse.
I'd be uneasy with electronically transferring funds for illicit drugs, cash seems wiser.
Well I must admit I've only really seen bits of various Star Wars films save for being taken to see Episode 1 as a kid so I don't really know much about it, besides what you can pick up from pop culture, I was just following what seemed a logical inference. Are "protocol droids" one and the same as whatever C3P0 is? I guess I figured a "kit build" in my mind is something like an amateur, enthusiast's project for kids or something so the fun and silly "personality" would be part and parcel with that design while ubiquitous robots made for more serious utilitarian reasons would I guess be less inclined have such features as they'd not be of great use to anyone.
I remember around 2005ish, maybe earlier, there was a company that started selling Duff beer here in Australia with the same font as from the Simpsons and a complete clone of the cartoon can design. Everyone thought it was cool and it became very popular very quickly. People were surprised that The Simpsons name would attach itself to a real life beer given it was a family show and this would be ripe for controversy. It came to light after only a couple of months that The Simpsons brand had nothing to do with it and the company had somehow managed to go through all the steps of bringing this to market and just presumably hoped they wouldn't get in to trouble. They were very quickly made to stop distributing those beers. Weird situation.
I really don't think giving the head of state the power to pardon is a very good idea. I used to be totally baffled how it was a thing at all but the rationale has since been explained to me. While I sorta get it, the theoretical benefit is far outweighed by the inevitable grimy reality. Like others, probably mostly because of my own biases, I find it hard to summon a great deal of outrage about this understandable if blatantly hypocritical move after so much prior abuse of the lower had already occurred, but frankly if the option weren't even there then nobody would even need to talk about this. If the justice system of the nation is supposedly well designed and theoretically trustworthy then there isn't the need to have the ability for it to be arbitrarily overrulled in a manner that operates very much like the monarchical tyrants the United States was supposedly foundationally opposed to.
I actually had similar theories though in the end I concluded that a person definitely couldn't be doing it, but I did used to rack my brains how the machine did it so fast. I had to do a project on how TV worked and was invented when I was in the 6th grade and it didn't help at all, the whole electron gun thing didn't explain it to me at all because I was imagining the gun like, drawing objects like trees and buildings and people and none of the boring confusing stuff I read helped me understand how this gun knew what to draw and could do it so quickly.