Jilanico @ Jilanico @lemmy.world

Cyberpunk Fashion

---

Read more

Posts

11

Comments

237

Joined

2 yr. ago

That's an interesting point. We're forced to make a judgement call because we don't have total control over what it generates.

Looking at a copyrighted font with your computer means the font is in your computer's memory. Do I go to jail for every site I visit that uses a fancy font?

Font files ≠ framebuffer

Images ≠ neural network weights

Some do. Should we jail all the talented artists with photographic memories?

If you asked me to draw an Italian video game character, I'd draw Mario too. Why can't an AI make copyrighted character inspired pics as long as they aren't being sold?

I think the onus is on the user of the AI. I could use Photoshop to make a joker pic and sell it for money. Should Photoshop be banned? The AI lets me do the same thing faster.

I agree, but I don't think these generative AIs actually store image files off the Internet in a massive database. I could be wrong.

So stable diffusion, midjourney, etc., all have massive databases with every picture on the Internet stored in them? I know the AI models are trained on lots of images, but are the images actually stored? I'm skeptical, but I'm no expert.

It's too hard to type up how generative AIs work, but look up a video on "how stable diffusion works" or something like that. I seriously doubt they have a massive database with every image from the Internet inside it, with the AI just spitting those pics out, but I'm no expert.

Tons of human made art isn't inspired by nature. Rather it's inspired by other human made art. Neural networks don't just copy paste like a yt plagiarist. You can ask an AI to plagiarize but no guarantee it'll get it right.

That's why I put inspired in quotes. It's analogous to a human seeing something on the Internet and coming up with similar art or building upon it.

Because this proves that the “AI”, at some level, is storing the data of the Joker movie screenshot somewhere inside of its training set.

Is it tho? Honest question.

I already know I'm going to be downvoted all to hell, but just putting it out there that neural networks aren't just copy pasting. If a talented artist replicates a picture of the joker almost perfectly, they are applauded. If an AI does it, that's bad? Why are humans allowed to be "inspired" by copyrighted material, but AIs aren't?

I don't really know the details of how "log in with your Google/Facebook account" works on other sites, but I imagine it'd work the same way. I'm no expert on this stuff tho.

Maybe look for a webapp and put a shortcut on her home screen?