JeSuisUnHombre @ JeSuisUnHombre @lemm.ee

Posts

12

Comments

240

Joined

2 yr. ago

The criticism is that a large portion of voters wouldn't support her if she wasn't running against someone like Trump. I know that criticism has at least some substance because it applies to me.

Edit: more specifically her campaign is using Trump as a bogeyman more than she's running on actual policy.

I think I understood the first paragraph before your comment but thank you for the clarification. And I do generally agree with your second paragraph as well. I do think it's a bit reductive and is often used to draw attention from the more substantial reasons.

Also deciding people are nuts is a great way to alienate and isolate them which will only entrench those ideas and can further radicalize them.

1. As a leftist that totally hates Trump, I am voting for Harris because it's not strategic for me to do otherwise. I still have the ability to recognize that the dems are doing their damndest to uphold a broken status quo that is actively harming everyone, especially children in Palestine.
2. Why shouldn't they paint the entire GOP as a threat when they are the party America's Hitler? The reason we have Trump in the first place is because the DNC wanted a bogeyman to get Hilary in in 2016, quickly found source from 2016. They shouldn't be trying to court Republicans, they should be trying to motivate people with real progress. The reason Hilary lost was because people are sick of establishment politicians and she was the embodiment of that establishment.

People are sick and tired of having 2 bad choices and nothing else.

I think I understood their sarcasm. They think I'm engaging in misogynistic tendencies and do actually think Trump voters are "nuts".

Super healthy and helpful mindset /s

Are downvoters disagreeing even though the biggest slogan to come out of the DNC was "we are not going back" (plus the point of the stunt this article is about)? Or do they think any criticism whatsoever of democrats is bad? This shouldn't be a controversial take.

She's running against arguably the worst candidate in American history and it's still a dead heat, what does that tell you?

I actually agree with Charlie. OJ is only a mixer. When I do drink it I much prefer to water it down.

Duke Nukem for PS3

I wish I could understand German. Because the video seems fun and yeah that's a pretty odd setting for a show that large.

My downvote wasn't in anger. It's more about the fact that this isn't a news article which makes it questionably breaking the rules of this /c/. Combined with the headline being serious editorializing via broad generalization of what the statement is. Not saying it's not true, just that it's a unnecessarily sensational.

it's discussed with city council

I don't see how this is money laundering or wire fraud. I hope he gets off. Or the real best solution would to make it so the revenue just goes to the artists the AI is ripping off.

https://lemmy.world/post/19384938

The police are typically just there to point guns, so I'd only call if I thought a gun was useful, which is extremely rare.

e: I'm answering from the USA

Yes, especially the kick drum

I understand the point and have definitely thought similar BUT, I like being able to feel the low end which can't happen at low volume.

The war ends and it goes back to apartheid, of religion and homeland, no genes required. And what evidence is there of what you're claiming?

Quit justifying genocide

This is not a surprise