Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)JA
Posts
1
Comments
292
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I'm on kbin too. I haven't seen any of the things that I see a lot of posts complaining about. (Beehaw, hexbear)

    I'm also pretty far left. I'm not a tankie though. I'm curious how much of the complaining is just right wingers bitching about reasonable opinions

  • The amount of times I've found absolute gems that have a 50% rating has caused me to go out of my way to watch them.

    Some of them stink, but I feel like critics are like everyone else and some of them can be pretty dense

  • I think they mean that what if you aren't actually flying your meat ship and just think that you are. That something else is flying it and maybe 'you' are just making constant justifications of behaviour to make it feel like you're flying it.

    What if you're not even number two? What if you're like 10th in line? You ever pick something up and think 'i should remember where I put that ' then you run around trying to find it later? Actual pilot can't remember and you're just justifying behavior. 'oh I forgot where I put it '
    Your forgetting is just a coping mechanism. ....

  • Coercive behavior doesn't quite work though.
    Yours is better than either of the ones posted, but I do think the physical force aspect is important to differentiate from other aspects.

    I was going to attempt to make a point about how stopping terrorism that isn't explicitly violent with violence isn't the same thing.

    Starving a population isn't violence, but it is terrorism. Attempting to give that population food and being stopped by the state by legal means is terrorism.

    The state is going to define things in specific ways to ensure that they're considered correct.

    I had written out a response to the person I replied to and then didn't post after reading some of their other comments. They're probably just a troll, or one of those people that's legitimately kind of smart but hasn't been around people that are incredibly smart, so hasn't had a reason to adjust their opinions about things because they might be shallowly correct but are fundamentally wrong. Like Newton's laws.

  • In general, he made decisions to attempt to buy the market rather than have the best services/console.

    I'm not sure if MS is going to go the good route, but they have said that their acquisitions won't be console exclusives. I've understood that consoles lose money. Selling games is where you make it. Why limit your games to a single console? We're unlikely to see incredible dominance of a console in the future. You'd just be limiting your consumer base

  • Violence is a key word in that definition.

    Violence: Behavior or treatment in which physical force is exerted for the purpose of causing damage or injury.

    So, starving a group of people isn't terrorism because you're not exerting physical force.

    Not easily stopping a fire when you know it's going to spread towards an occupied house isn't violence because you're not exerting physical force.

    Poisoning drinking water isn't violence because you're not exerting physical force.

    Real question: what do you call those things? It can't be defined as terrorism. What is it?