They've already overturned her twice. They know she's an incompetent hack & beholden to Trump.
I said it yesterday, she wants to be removed at a late enough stage of the trial that it will take another judge past the election to get up to speed on the case.
Yes. The "jury instructions" she's floating are actually the opposite of what the law states. This will be her third strike.
Personally, I think she wants to get removed from the case at a late enough point that another judge can't get up to speed in time for the trial to start before the election.
Irrelevant. Someone apparently forgot how to math.
If she retired, right fucking now, the GOP would block a new SCotUS pick until they were in power again & the democrats would allow that to happen.
Let's have this conversation again when it's a guarantee she can be replaced by a qualified jurist, and not Judge Beer 2.0