Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)JA
Posts
0
Comments
141
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • This is not a ban and it was never meant to be. They just force tiktok to sell the US market to a US company. Said US company will continue the platform just like it is at the moment, just with a bit more of that sweet American propaganda mixed into it. Tiktok won't be gone, all that data will just go to the NSA instead of the CCP, that's all they wanted.

  • Because Bethesda doesn't provide the legacy versions on steam, unlike other mod focused games, afaik. Once you've updated your game, you are stuck with whatever version you have.

    Sure, you can always download the right version from somewhere else, but I wouldn't count piracy + the risks coming with it as a viable excuse for their fuckup.

  • That's just your bubble. Most VPN users just want to circumvent geo restrictions.

    Besides that, the general VPN "propaganda" is that it encrypts your traffic and no-one can see it. The average user gets baited by that and doesn't care to look further into it.

  • If there is any benefit to it depends on how discord sells your data.

    The baseline assumption is that they just collect and sell everything as is, considering how shitty their privacy policy is and the general track record of corps following gdpr guidelins. With that barely anything changes.

    If we belive the claims in their policies, then things get a lot better. Only aggregated and anonymized information is shared for marketing. Apart from that only their direct partners get more personalised information. Sadly, Google will probably get a lot of it since they are one of Discords cloud service providers but it should still be less then them collecting it themselves.

    Now if we also assume they are following all GDPR laws, than even Google should only get very restricted information about you needed for their services.

    What they really do with your data is anyones guess. I assume its somewhere between 1 and 2, but there is no proof I know of. The only benefit I really see is that it's a lot easier to just block the one Discord API instead of 500 individual brokers.

  • "Hardmode" is just a fancy name for blocking all 3rd party scripts, which there aren't even any to block here in the first place. What does happen is that two of the three Discord domains get flagged and blocked:

    One is Discord.gg which is the Websocket to get and sent events, so it's needed for functionality.

    The other is Discordapp.net which is pretty much their media server.

    If you block all 3rd party scripts, frames and connections, then yes, your number of blocked items will shoot up into the hundreds. But if you knew what you are doing and just took a look at what was actually blocked, you would realise that it all was just requests for media and profile pictures. Even with fully enabled hardmode, there wasn't a single request from a 3rd party advertiser or data broker, not even Google.

    Your arrogance for using hardmode is completely unfounded if you don't even know what it really is blocking. All you are doing is looking at a number go up and are patting yourself on the back for it.

  • I'm not really sure what you did, but it certainly wasn't just opening discord.

    I just tried it and there isn't a single third party script in the browser version according to Ublock and noscript, there are only three scripts activ in total, all from different Discord subdomains. Maybe a few more if there are media links in the chat.

    If you look through the blocked connection requests they are also all made from the same source, namely the Discord science API, their internal data collector.

    The Discord homepage has a Google integration and a few embedded YouTube videos, but it's hard to find a website that doesn't have some form of Google scripts.

    Heck I don't even want to defend Discord here, but ia call bullshit on your story.

  • It also depends on your definition of cyberbullying. Is a mean comment under one or two posts already enough? Does it have to be consistent? Does it have to be from the same Person?

    I don't want to undersell Cyberbullying, it definitely is a problem, but a lot of these surveys have vague questions that can be interpreted in massively different ways, both from the person that answers them and from the researchers that formulated them.

  • Most Windows issues and annoyances can be fixed pretty easily with registry tweaks. This specific issue requires you to go trough the major effort of changing a single 0 to a 2.

    As long as its still easier to completely debloat windows instead of debugging Linux, your so called win is still far away.

  • To keep it short, there isn't really any privacy.

    Servers are public and Private messages are stored without any envryption. If you delete your account then the messages stay and can still be found with your unique ID (just like Reddit). From what ive read Discord also stores your HWIDs and monitors your running processes (with a valid reason considering their game integration). Some say they only store that locally, others claim something else, haven't seen any proof for either side so far.

    The problem really boils down to the fact that people treat discord as a private messenger instead of a public forum despite it clearly beeing the latter.

  • How did you suddenly go from spyware to propaganda and are even accusing me of beeing fooled by them? I don't even have Tiktok on my phone, I just fiddled with the algorithm in a containerised emulator.

    All I said is that I'd rather have China have my data than the US cause China is a much smaller potential threat to anyone outside their country.

  • Most governments even semi big companies don't allow whatsapp or other meta products on their hardware, is that precedent enough to ban meta too? Very few apps comply with the GDPR requirements needed on company/government hardware.

    Look, I despise Tiktok too, but most arguments on here are just "muh China bad" or "look at these other people doing something"

  • Your phone is 100% CIA spyware either way.

    Besides, I'd much rather have the CCP collect my data than the US, simply cause the CCP doesn't care about you if you don't go to China, but the US could hand over stuff to your government.

  • First, how does one even "fail" on MSO?

    Secondly, you switched over the least tech savvy people that relied solely on an existing workflow to get anything done. You destroyed their workflow, denied them the option to use older documents as a reference due to how badly messed up MS documents often get when opened with Libre and you gave them an alternative that's just different enough that nothing works as expected, but still similar enough to just be seen as a different office version.

    These are the last clients id switch over.

  • Can they find out?

    No, not really. The Metadata doesn't have a "pirated" flag and something like the product key doesn't get saved. Microsoft themselves probably know due to their telemetry but even they can't be bothered about it. I would bet that even you send a pirated document to the Microsoft CEO, they wouldn't notice or even care enough to look for it.

    But as always there is the important rule of "don't fuck with work stuff, ever".

    It's already questionable why she is editing company documents on here private PC without either a dedicated and remotely managed work particition + VPN or an O365 online work account. These documents fall under far stricter data safety regulations and the way it is right now, she is personally liable for any data leaks.

  • Windows asks you a few times to update now or later, gives you a timer of three hours and offers you to open the closed documents again without having to use autosave.

    I don't like the forced updates either, but if you lose anything to them it can be classified as "on purpose ".