Jaderick @ Jaderick @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

320

Joined

2 yr. ago

The only things I’ve seen that are exclusively non-leftist is the conservative Lemmy that thinks Fox News and Newsmax is a credible source of information

I’ve seen more praise for Chaplin for actually making fun of Hitler publicly where Hollywood still had business interests in Germany and wouldn’t really speak out. IIRC he got a lot of shit for it even though he showed the dramatic mannerisms and stupid ideology in full view.

I feel like the biggest reason he won’t be effective is that he’s against pure obstructionists in the GOP. They have no desire to govern and somehow won the House.

This is good to hear. I’ve heard she’s very much a politician first, actual person second from people who knew her, but that’s all secondhand.

2022 was the voter-led abortion amendment. I think you’re right though, Whitmer is a standard liberal in a similar vein as Joe Biden. She’s a very much a politician benefitting greatly from the Michigan GOPs absolute chaos. I’d honestly love for her to be the conservative candidate vs. an actual progressive change.

It always has. IIRC the biggest reason for bankruptcy in the US has been medical bills, for a while. Our greed driven system is garbage.

I like the podcast Behind the Bastards which frequently discusses grifters and how they got rich / influential. There’s a few episodes on COVID grifters that may interest you.

What an absolutely smooth-brained take lmao.

You’re the kind of person that thinks North Korea is a democratic republic because it has it in the name DPRK

it draws a clear conclusion

Quotes source

The reasons for the high number of pet killings by law enforcement are not clear.

????????

This is speculation because it’s reporting on the possible reasons for this estimated amount of pets killed by police. The title says 10,000 are killed a year but talks about estimates. The title is misrepresented.

Agree on the animal control part but most municipalities skimp or forego animal control.

Criminal and civil action comes in very few cases. I’m willing to bet very few people are shooting dogs for fun where the absolute majority is in defense of self or property.

Anecdotally the only civil action I’ve heard of is the Nashville case this past year of the guy shooting an off leash German Shepard

Videos are anecdotes not data, which this article is reporting on.

https://youtu.be/h2CplwwodEs?si=MUBcBdOt5apIw1Y2

Here is a video of dogs mauling a man and cops shooting them to stop it. There’s a lot of videos of this nature, just as I’m sure there are videos of cops overusing force as you claim but do not provide evidence for. My inquiry is about this article drawing the 10,000 dogs a year conclusion without parsing the reasons behind it, which it seems it does not.

Human lives are always above a non-sapient animals because otherwise you are some degree of a misanthropist. Misanthropy breeds contempt and contempt breeds hate.

The phrase “not provided any evidence” is applicable to your entire post as well.

Having been bit multiple times with blood loss I’m less inclined toward this joke, though I understand

I’ve seen videos of dogs mauling other dogs, children, grown men. Anecdotal videos are not data. Again, we both agree cops overuse force because there’s no consequences for them, but the question is does this article lump legitimate use of force on a dangerous animal with the overuse of force?

Edit: I did read the article and all it says is that we need to actually start recording data about this. I have great issue with the title of the article and the varied estimates it’s reporting on.

I haven’t heard this but that would be an interesting read

Some biosafety officers are scary man

Thank you dawg

Is this what the article says? You’re not wrong that police need far more oversight, but im having problems with this article and it’s reporting on the very real problem of police.

I could only read the first three paragraphs because of non-membership.

Edit: bad first paragraph on my part. The title comes from the 25-30 dogs a day estimate, but this also an estimate so the title should say it’s an estimate.

I also cannot read how they addressed use of police force on calls of dangerous animals. Dogs do kill people, especially children, and the use of police force is often necessary. Again, someone with the article please tell me how they address that, because the title seems to lump those in with actual cases of police abuse, which is bad propaganda.

There are better ways of reporting on the absolute police problem than this.

Disclosure: I have bias stemming from experienced attacks on myself and my dog from other dogs.

This is some “I have to be here on the weekend and I’m gambling the biosafety officer won’t notice” kinda shit lmao

The rates of colorectal cancer are increasing in young adults. It’s best you start earlier so that problematic polyps and adenomas can be removed before they get worse.

https://medicine.yale.edu/news-article/with-colorectal-cancer-rates-rising-among-younger-adults-a-yale-cancer-center-expert-explains-there-may-be-more-factors-behind-this-worrisome-trend/#:~:text=Nearly%20double%20the%20number%20of,by%20the%20American%20Cancer%20Society.