IttihadChe @ IttihadChe @lemmy.ml

Posts

0

Comments

292

Joined

5 mo. ago

It absolutely can be true, though slightly misworded.

1. the initial usage had nothing to do with the derogatory term.
2. upon realizing the relation to the derogatory term they adapted.

I've seen people like that super often, I've never measured but I've probably seen impatient honkers more than I've seen actual distracted people at a light. Your experience is not global.

This is not suggested as 1) honkers are usually already impatient and on edge 2) Road rage is real and very dangerous.

Ironic considering honkers are usually impatient/mad and are misusing the car horn because of that.

Theoretically, if they just have a slower reaction time than you, you are actually slowing them down as they now have to look around to make sure you aren't honking because of potential danger, which is the actual usage purpose of a car horn.

Edit: Additionally, this creates a broader societal danger as the "go when honked at!" mentality is entirely opposite of the true purpose of a horn.

Example: Person in front is about to go, you notice that someone is running the red light perpendicular, you honk to signal the danger, now instead of recognizing the danger, they go anyway, thinking you were impatiently honking, leading directly to an accident.

What do you do in real life.

Unless you're trying to use one. Then they're always broken.

Yes. That's literally what I said. You're the one using their admission of having 5% enrichment to claim they were building a bomb and that's why Israel attacked them (accepting Israels false justification on its face) ...did you forget what you're doing here or do you not know what a nuclear reactor is? (they're for power).

The only reason Israel attacked was because Iran started developing an atomic bomb after Trump tore up the agreement.

...

Your assuming he would survive

Enriched uranium is not a nuclear bomb. You are still just hardlining the war propaganda. This quote directly disproves your claim on its own, when taken with the fact they literally have a religious and political ruling against nuclear bombs, it's extra laughable.

5% specifically isn't even above commercial grade for nuclear reactors.

20%is the absolute minimum for it to even be considered "high enrichment uranium". But is most commonly used for research purposes still.

You need like 90% enrichment to achieve a proper nuclear weapon. Even little boy was 80% enriched and that was basically a prototype.

This is literally just taking Israeli Justification at its word.

Iran specifically has a fatwah (Religious and political ruling) against developing Nuclear Weapons. They've been insistant that they don't want nuclear weapons, the whole reason they were back at the table with Trump. The only reason they couldn't agree is that the US was demanding "0 enrichment", not that Iran was demanding nuclear bombs.

Funny enough, your "its Trumps fault for leaving the first deal" is the exact same justification Biden would have used if the bombing happened under him. Which it would have.

Your acceptance of both these narratives make it obvious you have internalized the Israeli/Western narratives on this issue. Almost like they had been setting the stage for this to happen for a while and even started developing the plan under biden...

Read the amnesty international report finding that Israel is committing genocide and their reasoning.

Which came out while Biden was in office.

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/12/amnesty-international-concludes-israel-is-committing-genocide-against-palestinians-in-gaza/

TLDR: Yes. It was literally the same Genocide under Biden. You just didn't care then unlike the rest of us.

What are these North Korean spy apps. For research...

The Iran situation only ended because America got involved. Israel was running out of air defenses and couldn't establish air superiority over enough of Iran to stop Guerilla style launches despite getting air superiority early on due to their initial surprise opening. Even before we "got involved" with the bombs, most of the missiles that got shot down were shot down by American systems iirc.

If the US ended support, Israel would have no choice but to capitulate and stop being a genocidal apartheid always picking fights in the region, or to activate the Samson option.

They were literally doing the same genocide under Biden this is denialism.

Joe Biden would have bombed Iran too. You think he's fine partaking in a genocide but draws the line at bombing Iran?

The MIC makes these decisions, the presidents role is to sell it to you.

"Biden I'm working constantly trying to get Israel to do a ceasefire" Constantly sends them weapons

Israel: "Joe Biden has never said the word ceasefire to us".

Liberals: "Trump is so unique for lying to us about Israel! It's totally not just a reflection of the systems flaws itself!"

This presumes the liberal view that liberalism is truly "freedom from the government" whatever that means(it's not) and that such a thing is a requirement for a leftist position (it's not)

The claim was

It’s a trend observable in all capitalist nations. If you develop enough, the rate of profit falls, and so you need to expand outward to profit. This is the basis of imperialism, the carving out of the global south for profit. Across the west, this is a fact, even if it manifests in different ways.

The trend is observable on the imperialized nations as well as the imperialist ones.

Imperialism is not a one way street, the effects of imperalialism are observable (lower capitalistic development, higher profit extraction, etc).

The fact that the countries with more developed capital are the ones doing imperialism and the countries with less developed capital are the ones imperialized (and oberving how this stays true historicllly) is proof of the trend.