Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)IT
Posts
19
Comments
177
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • What’s up with the broken tree defying gravity?

    Your choice Magic or bad outpainting

    The wolf is looking into the camera

    I will reprimand him for ruining the shot

    What is the boy thinking?

    what do youthink that he is thinking?

  • Short Answer: It depends on the model, the sampler you choose and the scheduler.

    In my experience: the more steps you use , the more detail you get but with diminishing returns the higher you go with your step count. Also the more steps, the more generation time (and room heating) you have.

    We also have now the "Turbo" Models which generate good images at a relatively low step count. For the turbo Models, you are a bit restricted regarding scheduler and sampler., but you get a detailed description for the model on the civitai Page. For example the civitai Page (CIVIT AI) of the model used for this Picture.

    For the "normal" (SDXL in this case) Models: Tiral and error. I normally use a xy Plot to check things like CFG Scale or Steps out.

    Here an example XY Plot for the Model SDXLFaetastic_v24. Testing different CFG Values and Steps with a constant sampler and scheduler. I´ve used the same Prompt as for the base image for the contest picture (Screenshot of the Plot, the original Image has 120MB:

    In the original Plot you see differences at different step counts.

  • I remembered an article about False Vacuum (Wikipedia) when i thought about this challenge. We see the remains of an alternate reality, condensed to this little "Stone" by the pressure of our reality.

    Made with comfyui, using outpainting. The workflow should be embedded in this picture (Catbox).