Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)IS
Posts
0
Comments
524
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Bernie Sanders hasn’t achieved anything in his entire useless life.

    Look up his legislative record

    They don’t work with a coalition to pass law,

    Yeah, lets look up some stuff.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders#Legislation

    In 2005, Rolling Stone called Sanders the "amendment king" for his ability to get more roll call amendments passed than any other congressman during the period since 1995, when Congress was entirely under Republican control. Being an independent allowed him to form coalitions across party lines

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Oh no, I never said that they are only separable by time.

    You may not have said it, but you typed it. Lets look at the replay.

    And you can equate religions and cults because the only difference between the two is time.

    It can’t only be time that transforms the one into the other

    I agree with you here.

  • Ashli Babbitt got shot full on by the secret service

    Ashli Babbitt isn't an example of the USSS taking down a threat. Your source claims:

    she was shot in the left shoulder by a United States Capitol Police (USCP) officer.

    The USCP isn't the USSS (by my understanding, which is based on Wiki). I understand that the USSS were present at Jan 6 though, so your point stands.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • And you can equate religions and cults because the only difference between the two is time.

    There is more difference than time. Cults require a charismatic, authoritarian leader, religions do not. One can be religious and autonomous in practice.

    Religions can be open source and decentralised, cults cannot.

  • Fellas, is it gay to want a woman that wants you?

    Idk what it is about masculinity that loves submissive women

    That's insecure masculinity. Men who are secure don't need a woman to be submissive. She will be with him by her own volition because she feels safe with him.