Isoprenoid @ Isoprenoid @programming.dev

Posts

0

Comments

524

Joined

2 yr. ago

I haven’t been happy about TF2 since they added hats and bullshit.

So since 2009? You haven't been happy with TF2 for over 15 years.

Yeah, it's strange to label it as "not threatened" when there is a "data deficient" label available.

It appears that the "data deficient" label is avoided as much as possible:

https://www.doc.govt.nz/Documents/science-and-technical/sap244.pdf Page 27

Follow the money. Where do the tariffs end up?

Wouldn't that be "are you DNA helicase, because I want you to unzip my genes?"

If the other person is the enzyme, then they are the unzipper.

Per the article, they just developed a faster algorithm for a specific type of material simulation.

You're underplaying it.

As per the article:

This has broad implications for industries that require detailed material analysis, including:

Aerospace and Defense: Improved modeling of material stress and failure in aircraft structures.

Engineering and Manufacturing: More efficient testing of materials for construction and industrial applications.

Military Research: Faster development of impact-resistant materials for defense systems.

This is why:

"It ain't stupid if it works."

is fundamentally incorrect.

The one you use.

It says in the article

Unlike conventional batteries, supercapacitors have an exceptionally long lifespan, lasting hundreds of thousands of charge-discharge cycles, whereas lithium batteries typically last only five years or less.

It doesn’t say what type of capacitor is used

Yes, it does. They're supercapacitors.

I think it's a joke. Instead of "The God Particle", it's "the dog particle".

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3334576/

Not sure why you were downvoted, you are correct. You can't even say "Winnie the Pooh".

https://gamerant.com/marvel-rivals-banned-words-winnie-the-pooh/

NetEase is the developer of Marvel Rivals. They are a huge Chinese based company, they have ties to the CCP.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NetEase https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marvel_Rivals

angry tone.

Sarcastic tone, you're reading what I wrote in an angry voice. Try reading with a happy voice. 😉

that’s 1000+ years of potential change that we have no way of disproving.

What if that's not the point?

"Oh, but it's not exactly what that person said!"

So what? Taking sentences out of context is bad interpretation anyway, especially if we aren't reading the original language with the original cultural context (again, which was over 2 thousand years ago).

You're arguing for the letter of the law, I'm arguing for the spirit.

I wonder if those stories even matter, like they are from a culture so far removed from us (over 2 thousand years) that the lessons probably shouldn't be hard interpreted.

We wouldn't like people to have differing opinions about stuff? Everyone should believe what we believe, think what we think. /s

Maybe this is how the bible was written, rewritten and evolved over time.

Nope. But it is sometimes in how it is interpreted, and translated.

We have biblical manuscripts that date back past 100 BC. Can't rewrite something which we have original manuscripts of.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_manuscript

Who told you that you are bad? Can you trust their assessment? Was their assessment correct at the time of assessment? Have things changed since that assessment? Did they know everything about you to be able to make that assessment? Bad in what way? In every way? How could that be possible?

We barely understand ourselves, how can we rely on anyone to make that judgement?

For those (like me) who aren't familiar with virus genetics, this is called recombination. Yes, it is possible between influenza and bird flu because they are the same virus type.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK8439/#A2330

The warrant enables the supplier to advertise that they supply to the royal family.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_royal_warrant_holders_of_the_British_royal_family

We need to quit wasting time and resources on these type of shooters and bad people get them gone and let’s grow better as a civilization.

While I understand your position, I disagree. Instead of death, if we do our best to learn about these people and prevent further destruction we'll all be better off (if that means life imprisonment, then so be it). I'm sure there are plenty of criminologists willing to curate that knowledge.

If we learn more about them, then we gain the tools to grow better as a civilisation as you put it.

Andrew Wakefield has a lot to answer for.

Nah, downvoted because it doesn't spark healthy discussion.

"What about freedom of speech?" isn't a valid question because the article is about social media, not a government. There are no freedom of speech rights on social media platforms.