Imotali @ Imotali @lemmy.world

Posts

2

Comments

153

Joined

2 yr. ago

Moderating

---

They were banned for transphobia. Finish that comment. Don't cherry pick their words. Transphobia and bigotry are against the rules here. As a cis person, I don't get to decide what is transphobic; trans people do.

They were forcibly shoved through the door.

idk, I just got to yeet like at least a handful of transphobes into oblivion so.... was pretty fun.

Mod here. Just want to openly and unequivocally state... I will remove your comment if you're transphobic. I will refer to trans people to let me know if you are being transphobic. I will ban you if you make an egregiously off colour comment. and I will take pleasure in doing this. Fuck your transphobic bullshit, go somewhere else. Nobody wants you here.

You are so objectively wrong.... and fortunately for me: I don't have to listen to you, and will now use that authority to make others not have to listen to you for you violated the civility rule of the instance!

Have fun not interacting with this community anymore.

Biologically incorrect.

Did I say anything about liking their stances? No. They're a private company though. They can do as they fucking please.

In fact the only way to force them to not censor anyone is to eliminate their (the owners) first amendment rights. That's why private companies are not beholden to it. Unfortunately this concept is foreign to right wing nuts.

"Censorship" lol, cry harder.
Her platform, her rules. Don't like it? Leave. This ain't a government, you have no free speech rights here or anywhere else on the internet, don't like how a site operates/what a site allows? Then leave.

If you could edit in an instance-agnostic link (!communityname@host-instance.com) for example: !newcommunities@lemmy.world would be this one.

Makes finding your community on other instances easier (and is technically required for our formatting rules)

I love how you're admitting that you don't understand the concept of changing your opinion and maturing with this statement.

Seeing as our (Cali) CCPA is about as strict (if not moreso) than the GDPR it's not a longshot that they might.

Which this isn't totally solving. Don't get me wrong this is a good thing. But the real issue with planned obsolescence is OS support.

1. I didn't state it for EV ranges because my stated ranges accounted for that fact. To say "they can only use 80% of their battery charge" would be misleading in the context of the listed ranges.
2. This isn't false you're essentially saying "you're right but it's mostly not the engine" in other words: you're being a pedantic git
3. They can disagree all they want, I'm actually correct and have the stats (which you have yet to refute) to back my statements up.
4. I never claimed to be nice.

Pretty much only conservatives. They're actually pretty obsessed with thinking about children being raped in bathrooms.

I'm not twisting any stars at all. If you have an issue with my math: present it or gtfo

Users here who have not sourced shit and mentioned objectively false information.

Moment you put forth false info, I ignore your opinion as invalid. So frankly, idgaf what the very clearly incorrect people in this thread think. Their opinion is based in falsehoods.

I carry around an iPhone 13 and an old Motorola. It's not that bad.

I don't trust most LA drivers to handle two degrees of freedom (technically one and a half) why the fuck would I trust them with six then?

It's Quora.