When they run candidates for lower offices in "safe" districts, and can win seats there. At that point, they can force the Dems into coalition building.
Or when the Republican party has about as much influence as the Libertarian and Constitution parties. Either/or.
One of the reasons I love my town is there is a great, thriving small business culture. It's relatively easy to shop local for a lot of things.
That said, it can be expensive, and there are certainly things it's not easy to find locally, so sometimes I do, unfortunately, turn to Amazon. But I try to minimize it.
The funny thing is, if they did endorse Harris, probably nobody would notice or care. But the fact that they were stopped from endorsing Harris is now a huge story.
Have you considered that they've encountered enough people who only ever seem to criticize Harris and accusing anyone who supports her of loving genocide, and suspiciously avoid saying a word about the other guy, that they, themselves, have stopped giving the benefit of the doubt?
We are literally in a thread where it's reported that Trump plans to let Israel do whatever the fuck they want, and you still want to pretend that Harris is somehow the worse choice.
Can confirm. Been watching wrestling since I was a child, and a lot of this stuff has been openly known in the fan community for decades. I expect we'll see a lot more of this stuff hitting the mainstream press, since Vince is no longer in a position to stop it.
That said, it's amazing how, every time my opinion of Vince can't go any lower, something new comes out and it somehow does.
Nixon started the rot with the Southern Strategy. Reagan made it so much worse. Both of them were complete and utter pieces of shit.
Yeah, if you want a healthy, nontoxic Republican party, you gotta go back to Eisenhower.