If you can so easily google shit your self, why could you not provide a single source to back up your claim about children as human shields in hospitals?
If you belive that you have been told lies, why do you say such things so matter of factually? Do you still think that is the case?
And why is it that you get this excessive reaction at mild push back?
Why is it that you can't be asked to do what you ask of others?
Could you perhaps see how one could easily be lead to the conclusion that you're not acting in the spirit you claim to?
You just claimed that Hamas hides behind children in hospitals backed up but fucked all and you never provided anything. And no, asking questions is not a response to it. So your note in any position tho make demands like that.
This is some actual leadership looks like. It's not something that commes around every 4 years around election time trying to triangulate a voting block.
It's a quite simple observation that even when you dictate the terms of your own example, you have genocide as a given. That you fail to see it is nothing but expected.
They're pretending it's to save the hostages again? Negotiations is the only tactic that has saved hostages in any realistic sence. They are returning to the strategy wherein they themselves have killed more hostages then they ever been close to saving. This is about the slaughtering of Palestinas, nothing else.
This is beyond the tipping point where selective enforcement shows it face. If this is crossing the line practically any picture of politician or historical figure is inciting violence.
From what I've heard you need a password that changes on the daily to start a F-35 and that the US are the only ones that can provide it. If that is true, it's a tremendous oversite for any sovereign state.
Yes, but he has to read a book. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky