I had only read that there were changes under the hood and also in the UI/UX. I hadn't tested it yet and thought I'd just ask. It could have been that you had also only used the older versions and now there might have been changes.
I don't know, but of course it could be. I had only heard that vance had visited him, which was just as shitty an action as the unwanted visit to Greenland.
Nope. It's no comparison to Dead Cells. Even the combat system and the level structure are completely different. The fact that the game is geared more towards co-op than solo should also be mentioned. Nevertheless, it's a great game, especially because it's not Dead Cells but its own thing. The game runs very smoothly and the battles are just as good. The controls and handling are both very smooth. It's perfect for playing 1-2 rounds from time to time.
Well, it is a research reactor. What does the West have to show for itself? What does America have to show for itself? So we're laughing even though we're being left behind? Are we already so extremely stupid... No wonder America is becoming an idiocracy and Europe is following suit.
Btw, I have listed the reasons why things are currently failing in the West.
It would have to be extremely state-regulated capitalism (because of people like Musk,Bezos,Zuckerberg etc for example).
But above all: taxes! So on the rich. (So that taxes are distributed more fairly and, above all, the working class is relieved. In other words, taxes should go up and not down.
So that knowledge is not poached from friendly countries through low taxes. So that the state itself earns financially, which could ultimately be distributed fairly)
Democracies should be able to protect their own form of government... but they didn't think about that when they were founded because everyone was happy about the positive outcome. So our democracies are under attack from within. ( So that the far right or far left can't take over. Or can be destabilized by external influences. )
Above all, America should regulate tech companies more. ( No spying on citizens and such. No mass theft of intellectual property etc )
Tax havens should be prevented, etc( Because it enables tax evasion and other negative effects)
It just needs to be protected from abuse. Private individuals should never have too much money and therefore automatically power. ( Well, we can see the result if it is not protected in America. )
For example, I didn't say a word about citizens holding power over the state. (Which of course should be the case)
If the state controls everything and resources etc. are distributed fairly, there is no competition.
"Where capitalism promotes efficiency, socialism focuses on equality and solidarity, a redistribution of wealth from the rich to the poor and the creation and maintenance of a level playing field"
Equality excludes the whole thing from the outset ( developing ). It would ultimately end in unequality.
That's why it would have to be ( now it's getting funny ) socialist capitalism.
Edit: State capitalism e.g. Scandinavia.
Would you now say that the people there are in a bad way?
What would be the alternative? Socialism and thus the standstill of further development? It would have to be extremely state-regulated capitalism. But above all taxes! So on the rich. Democracies would have to be able to protect their own form of government... but they didn't think about it when they were founded because everyone was happy about the positive outcome. So that our democracies are attacked from within. Above all, America needed to regulate tech companies more. Tax havens should be prevented, etc.
Capitalism itself promotes further development. It just needs to be protected from abuse. Private individuals should never have too much money and therefore automatically have power.
Now I have skipped through the video. Nice on eBay next to auction already times a fixed amount to choose from, that should already make skeptical. Then also color deviations from the prototypes shown.
But above all, only pictures of the visuals. No device switched on and no display of hardware information.
We live in a time where all hardware is also counterfeited and, in addition to the bad counterfeits, good quality counterfeits also appear and even manufacturers demand to recognize the counterfeits.
So something as extremely simple as a case is really no problem at all, even if it is of the same quality.
So as long as no information is provided by the seller to verify it, I wouldn't give a damn.
They deserve respect? For the criminal methods they used back then? FCK nvidia! That's like paying respect to MS or Intel + Nvidia to destroy the market in the long term in monopoly positions.
( First of all, this is not a criticism of the users. I used to use Intel and Nvidia myself. It's towards Nvidia and their dirty company policy. )
For the other pushed valve Steamdeck or steamOS. This allows valve to offer an environment on verified hardware where publishers would otherwise be looking for excuses.
I had only read that there were changes under the hood and also in the UI/UX. I hadn't tested it yet and thought I'd just ask. It could have been that you had also only used the older versions and now there might have been changes.