Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)IA
Posts
2
Comments
368
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • In my opinion shooting back raises the likelihood of getting out alive as you are not just a sitting duck.

    And I to think people generally don't want to murder. But what people want more than not to kill is to not be killed.

    So use your gun or lose your gun. Doesn't make sense otherwise.

  • I really don't get why people don't start shooting police. As I understand it guns are allowed to "defend yourself against the government". Police is the government and they clearly are out of control shooting people.

    So either use your weapons against the government or make guns illegal if you don't use them anyway.

    So in the end there are less cops which in return means less people shot dead by cops or cops are less scared because people don't have guns and so they also don't get shot by cops.

    What I am saying is: either use your guns or make them illegal if you don't use them anyway.

  • What the hell is going on with the manbear debate?

    When a wolf sees another wolf in the forrest, the wolf thinks: "that must be a wolf."

    When a person sees another person in the forrest, the person thinks: "that must be a murderer."

  • I can see your point. Other have sad that it should follow the horsearmor pattern. Which would make it a guess like "I wonder if I can use this animal part like the other animal parts which fill the same role."

    That way you could formulate an educated guess and be happy when it turns out right.