It's the privilege thing that gets me every time. Not everyone can participate in your exclusive food club and be healthy and fulfilled. Let people do the best they can with what they have.
I've not had this experience with vegans because I don't really know many people who are vegan, but I always find it funny when a vegetarian says something like "you could add chicken or beef if you wanted" when the whole point of asking for the recipe is that you liked it enough to try to make it again... It's kind of adorable and sweet.
The very first vegan I ever knew talked at me for 10 minutes about how I should go vegan. It was the only 10 minutes I knew her. I was 15, still living with my parents, didn't have a way to get around, and my family was fairly poor. Oh, and my mother didn't cook so much as unboxed dinner, because the kitchen was always filthy. I definitely walked away from that interaction feeling like I'd been told I was a terrible human who deserves to suffer by a rude principal. So yes, they definitely exist.
I've never met a Vegetarian that wasn't chill about it, though.
I'm sure there are plenty of chill vegans too, but some of them come off like an annoying televangelist, in my experience.
That choice is steeped in privilege though, and I think it's worth acknowledging that. Food choices are just something we shouldn't be judging other people on, regardless of what those choices are. "Fed is best" applies through all stages of life.
The fact that you just think people should live more poorly and with less nutrition if they can't afford the fru fru stuff is really disturbing.
I've been rive and beans only poor before. It sucked a lot. And on the rare occasion I could get some meat or cheese in my diet I definitely wasn't in a position to be worried about which choice was "worse". I just wanted some freaking variety. I should be able to have that. Everyone should.
Also, your credit cards are a different kind of "loan" - revolving - vs those other debts, which are installment. Having a mix of the two will improve your credit. They literally want it to be impossible to have good credit without the cards.
The first time I wanted to finance a car I discovered I have what's called a "thin file." My (interest free) student loan wasn't reporting to all 3 agencies. I was able to get my dad to co-sign. I was 26. Discovered then that being told "never ever ever own a credit card" (by my dad!) was very bad advice. Get one with a low limit and use it to pay the same bill every month. Credit! Now other places trust that you pay your bills.
I've since gotten several cards (it's been nearly a decade) and they each serve a different specific purpose. I purposely target high signing bonuses and my purchases are better protected. My limits are stupid high, which I guess is nice but I'll never put that much on so it's a bit pointless. Then again, knowing I have access to that if things ever become dire is nice.
I mean, the containers are steel filled with concrete. We also leave our bridges and buildings outside, exposed to the elements.
The place in the world you are most likely to know the exact amount of radiation you are receiving at any moment is probably at a nuclear power plant. Its not like they just abandon them and never check on them or anything. They sit out in the open just... chillin. Being generally monitored but mostly just.... chillin.
WIPP is for low level transuranic waste from DOE projects, just FYI. Not super toxic stuff. They ship it in these super tough containers that they test by dropping on a spike and putting in a furnace. Wild to watch.
Difficult considering social security isn't a tax. Without looking it up my guess is that number rolls up the 14-15% of SS and Medicare taxes so the real number is lower.
Idk why you're being down voted. I just watched a Legal Eagle video that pretty much described the change as being exactly related to this. If the appeal fails, he still owes the original judgement amount and if he doesn't come up with the money they will seize some property. If the appeal works out for the orange man then they don't have to try to undo a sale.
Appeals courts are good things. And everyone, including that a-hole, is entitled to appeal.
Now, it's super annoying he can brag about having the money in public but argue in court he doesn't, but hey, that's our former president. Talks only out of his ass and never suffers any consequences from it.
With any luck the appeal will fail miserably and he'll still be on the hook for the full amount.
This is how I feel about my gender now. I'm AFAB and mostly fine with it. In my 30s so don't feel like I can opt out at this point without some major major sacrifices. But if I could start again I'd be a dude, even if I was still AFAB. I sort of envy kids that got to grow up hearing that switching was an option, but then I think about the state of everything else and I figure I still probably got the better deal.
Okay let's go with your thing. So developer can now, by your logic, pick any property they want and just build there without the consent of the owner, as long as they later find a similar enough lot to switch with the owner later? And the owner just has to agree to it because it's still a fair trade?
First off, RBMK (Chernobyl) wasn't safe as designed. In the US, the style of reactor wouldn't have made it through the required licensing.
Second of all, the consequences being way worse is an exaggeration. If a nuclear power plant has a small release, the (real, scientific) impact would be minimal. If it has a large release then something else happened and the reactor containment was destroyed and whatever massive natural disaster did that is causing waaaaayy more problems. We're probably all dead anyway.
People are afraid of radiation because you can't see or smell or hear it. Which is probably a good thing considering you are surrounded by it all the time.
Someone recently said to me that if people had been introduced to electricity by watching someone die in an electric chair, they'd refuse to have power in their homes. People were introduced to radiation by an atomic bomb.
Oh absolutely the corporations are going to want to maximize profit. There are just a lot of things they can't get out of, especially when it comes to safety.
The nuclear industry (in the US) since TMI has had a heavy amount of oversight from its regulatory body. That the plants pay for, too, which is good.
It's risks are pretty minimal, in the grand scheme. I won't say non-existent of course. The possibility of a release is always there, but the impact is going to be measured in negative public perception, not deaths. One of the reasons the plants cost so much to build is because they have to stick a real big concrete dome over the dangerous bit.
It's the privilege thing that gets me every time. Not everyone can participate in your exclusive food club and be healthy and fulfilled. Let people do the best they can with what they have.