INeedMana @ INeedMana @lemmy.world

Posts

7

Comments

411

Joined

2 yr. ago

Yes, for sure. But then that's a "lost cache". Similar to the works we'll find in a few years buried somewhere under the ground. But what about "active collections"?

Interesting indeed

But also those two are cases when we discovered more or less "working copies" of interest.
Has there been a similar find of a text that was copied and given (I'm trying to broadly cover a meaning of "published" here)

Thank you!

I guess the community of private collectors might have (doesn't have to be institutionalized, centralized nor digital, just the fact of knowing is enough) as a group some kind of grasp on who has what. But is that fact known?

Huh, that's an example of what I've been looking for

What phrase should I search for to learn more about the archive?

But do we know if those have been generally indexed?

Yes, but that is a case when we knew we had them, we just couldn’t read them. I’m wondering if at least “index” of readable contents of most “libraries” is for sure known, mostly known or maybe there are many we don’t know what’s inside

Yes, but that is a case when we knew we had them, we just couldn't read them. I'm wondering if at least "index" of readable contents of most "libraries" is for sure known, mostly known or maybe there are many we don't know what's inside

I think that methodology is wrong. If they analyzed only one instance, then the whole follwer-followee thing might be completely off. And while they measured how many replied frequently, it lacks the "how many replies they got" side

It's like comparing engagement on whole network vs via only one edge

I don't use X

I also switched to scripts. Aliases tend to break in loops with modified IFS

I think that having any kind of recognizable email is against the idea of privacy. So I would set up the following layering:

1. Mozilla Relay/TempMail (randomized email accounts)
   for most of shops, job applications, etc. If it leaks you can easily disable the account and/or rotate it on periodic basis to limit the cross-database matching (the privacy part)
2. a few separate domains for things where you can't stop receiving mails or having an account is really worth it

• one for banks
• one for government
• one for the few shops where the first layer is not enough
• one for private exchange

1. the provider that can change

No, on work laptop

"Tell me it's Friday without saying it's Friday" ;)

But to the point, yeah, my current job tried to convince me to switch to Windows. I tried, it was miserable experience, it broke in 3 days and all that was even before the current Windows ludicrousness

According to OP, that question was a showerthought

I think this is not a showerthought

Well. What if it really is one?
😱

What about the can Ada, though?

To think, one shower is all it takes to explore the flesh of fish :D

No idea. But isn't it that salmon meat more sticks together when tuna meat more often breaks apart?

Are you sure there was only one tuna in the can? I don't eat cans often but have you ever gotten a different batch of tuna? Like different sizes of chunks, different curl? I wouldn't be surprised if into one can a sorted batch of similar patches from different tunas was packed. "To ensure the quality of experience"