Skip Navigation

Posts
24
Comments
401
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • A bit of both I imagine.

  • That's just propaganda from BEV companies. They just saying that so people won't realize that hydrogen solves many of the problems of electric cars.

  • We will drop electric cars because hydrogen cars are fundamentally superior.

  • People really don't know what "left" is suppose to mean. Socialism is suppose to be a real political position, not a slur. What is consider liberal these days is really right-wing politics.

  • Everyone with a brain has left Xitter.

  • This parallels the height of GM, when they put money in everything from satellites to ATMs. Sure, at the time there was plenty of money to dump on such ventures. But eventually, those bad bets caught up to them. It seemed like a "no big deal" when a hugely profitable company wasted billions of dollars on bad investments. But each one of those bad investments represented a lost opportunity for a good investment. Eventually, the cash cow at GM ended, and the company is left with nothing but huge debts and worthless investments. Any tech company that is just buying the equivalence of lottery tickets is probably destined for failure too, no matter how profitable it is right now.

  • For the time being, dams will have to exist. But eventually, there will come a time when we won't need nearly as many dams.

  • The dam still causes huge environmental damage though. We may not want to use dams like that.

  • It's a strong argument in favor of nuclear power. You get power like a dam, but without the impact on local ecosystems.

  • Dams are hugely problematic in their own way. Dam removal is a real thing. We may want fewer dams in the future.

  • And another with hydropower removed. Dams weren't exactly built with green energy as a goal.

  • Nuclear is way safer than just about any other energy source.

  • Lack of infrastructure is the only issue left. The problem with BEVs is that not everyone can own one or afford one. People who insisting on BEVs because they are doable now are doing what the people who pushed for diesel cars did a decade ago. It is just a short-term idea that will eventually backfire.

  • The goal is to eliminate all car companies that isn't controlled by China.

    You don't own any of the supply chain that provides the batteries and solar panels. The West barely makes solar panels because China's strategy already succeeded.

    No one sold a BEV a dozen or so years ago. People are just complaining rather than pushing for change.

  • There are challenges to every technology. But on the whole, hydrogen cars are a "solved" problem. We can all switch to them if we wanted to. The problem is BEV propaganda making shit up against hydrogen cars. This is really an attempt to block progress.

    BEVs are a very limited idea. Not everyone can own one. The grid is not setup to handle hundreds of million of BEVs charging. And the resource requirements make them effectively unsustainable in their own right. So in reality, it's time to scale back our obsession for BEVs. If for nothing else, so we can have a backup option. The last thing we want is a BEV monopoly.

  • Hydrogen is electrolyzed from water. It is basically a battery made from water. It is a much better idea than a battery made from expensive metals that have to be mined in vast quantities.

  • You're just promoting BEV propaganda. And being a stooge of the Chinese government, the only group that even benefits from BEVs displacing all local car production. It is not a revolutionary technology. It is an obsolete idea from the 19th century. It is a greenwashing scam to think it has any real merit.

    Meanwhile, hydrogen is made from water and represent an actual green technology.

  • BEVs are a greenwashing scam. They are frankly just a ploy by corporations to be dependent on their product just like we are to oil. In fact, it's even worse since it is part of the Chinese government's agenda to of dominating the car industry. Much of what we hear may legitimately be propaganda from the Chinese government.

    Toyota is fundamental correct in their assessment. The BEV is destined for failure since it has no purpose but the serve some specific group or interest. As a result, they've invested in alternative ideas such as hydrogen cars. Instead of being the curve, they are likely far ahead of it. It is everyone else that wasting all of their resources on a dead-end.